Biosynthetic scaffolds for partial meniscal loss: A systematic review from animal models to clinical practice

被引:23
|
作者
Veronesi, F. [1 ]
Di Matteo, B. [2 ,7 ]
Vitale, N. D. [2 ,3 ]
Filardo, G. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Visani, A. [1 ]
Kon, E. [2 ,3 ]
Fini, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Complex Struct Surg Sci & Technol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, I-20090 Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[4] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Appl & Translat Res Ctr, Bologna, Italy
[5] Osped Reg Lugano, Orthopaed & Traumatol Unit, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
[6] Univ Svizzera Italiana, Fac Biomed Sci, Lugano, Switzerland
[7] First Moscow State Med Univ Sechenov Univ, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Ulitsa 19c1, Moscow 119146, Russia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Meniscal scaffold; Meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis; Regenerative medicine; Collagen; Polyurethane; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; FIBER-REINFORCED SCAFFOLD; PARTIAL MEDIAL MENISCECTOMY; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; POLYURETHANE SCAFFOLD; COLLAGEN MENISCUS; IN-VIVO; ALLOGRAFT TRANSPLANTATION; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.033
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Acute or degenerative meniscus tears are the most common knee lesions. Meniscectomy provides symptomatic relief and functional recovery only in the short- to mid-term follow-up but significantly increases the risk of osteoarthritis. For this reason, preserving the meniscus is key, although it remains a challenge. Allograft transplants present many disadvantages, so during the last 20 years preclinical and clinical research focused on developing and investigating meniscal scaffolds. The aim of this systematic review was to collect and evaluate all the available evidence on biosynthetic scaffolds for meniscus regeneration both in vivo and in clinical studies. Three databases were searched: 46 in vivo preclinical studies and 30 clinical ones were found. Sixteen natural, 15 synthetic, and 15 hybrid scaffolds were studied in vivo. Among them, only 2 were translated into clinic: the Collagen Meniscus Implant, used in 11 studies, and the polyurethane-based scaffold Actifit (R), applied in 19 studies. Although positive outcomes were described in the short- to mid-term, the number of concurrent procedures and the lack of randomized trials are the major limitations of the available clinical literature. Few in vivo studies also combined the use of cells or growth factors, but these augmentation strategies have not been applied in the clinical practice yet. Current solutions offer a significant but incomplete clinical improvement, and the regeneration potential is still unsatisfactory. Building upon the overall positive results of these "old" technologies to address partial meniscal loss, further innovation is urgently needed in this field to provide patients better joint sparing treatment options.
引用
收藏
页码:3782 / 3800
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scaffolds for partial meniscal replacement: an updated systematic review
    Papalia, Rocco
    Franceschi, Francesco
    Balzani, Lorenzo Diaz
    D'Adamio, Stefano
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 107 (01) : 19 - 40
  • [2] Are the Biological and Biomechanical Properties of Meniscal Scaffolds Reflected in Clinical Practice? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Ranmuthu, Chanuka D. S.
    Ranmuthu, Charindu K. I.
    Russell, Jodie C.
    Singhania, Disha
    Khan, Wasim S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (03)
  • [3] Animal models used in meniscal repair research from ex vivo to in vivo: A systematic review
    Mazy, David
    Lu, Daisy
    Leclerc, Sebastien
    Laor, Boaz
    Wang, Jessica
    Pinvicy, Alix
    Moldovan, Florina
    Nault, Marie-Lyne
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 55 : 23 - 31
  • [4] A systematic review of animal and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for urethral repair
    Qi, Na
    Li, Wen-jiao
    Tian, Hong
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 36 (01) : 111 - 117
  • [5] A systematic review of animal and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for urethral repair
    Na Qi
    Wen-jiao Li
    Hong Tian
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2016, 36 : 111 - 117
  • [6] A Systematic Review of Animal and Clinical Studies on the Use of Scaffolds for Urethral Repair
    祁娜
    李文娇
    田虹
    Current Medical Science, 2016, (01) : 111 - 117
  • [7] Meniscal scaffolds: results and indications. A systematic literature review
    Giuseppe Filardo
    Luca Andriolo
    Elizaveta Kon
    Francesca de Caro
    Maurilio Marcacci
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 35 - 46
  • [8] Meniscal scaffolds: results and indications. A systematic literature review
    Filardo, Giuseppe
    Andriolo, Luca
    Kon, Elizaveta
    de Caro, Francesca
    Marcacci, Maurilio
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [9] The performance of bone tissue engineering scaffolds in invivo animal models: A systematic review
    Oliveira Ferraz de Misquita, Marcos Ricardo Dantas
    Bentini, Ricardo
    Goncalves, Flavia
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2016, 31 (05) : 625 - 636
  • [10] Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Animal Models
    Lezcano, Maria Florencia
    Alvarez, Giannina
    Chuhuaicura, Priscila
    Godoy, Karina
    Alarcon, Josefa
    Acevedo, Francisca
    Gareis, Ivan
    Dias, Fernando Jose
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2022, 11 (05):