Collaborative care for depression in general practice: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

被引:5
作者
Brinck-Claussen, Ursula Odum [1 ]
Curth, Nadja Kehler [1 ]
Davidsen, Annette Sofie [2 ,3 ]
Mikkelsen, John Hagel [1 ,5 ]
Lau, Marianne Engelbrecht [1 ,6 ]
Lundsteen, Merete
Csillag, Claudio [1 ,7 ]
Christensen, Kaj Sparle [4 ,8 ]
Hjorthoj, Carsten [1 ]
Nordentoft, Merete [1 ,9 ]
Eplov, Lene Falgaard [1 ]
机构
[1] Mental Hlth Ctr Copenhagen, Mental Hlth Serv, Kildegardsvej 28, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Res Unit Gen Practice, Oster Farimagsgade 5,Postboks 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Gen Practice, Oster Farimagsgade 5,Postboks 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Mental Hlth Ctr Frederiksberg, Mental Hlth Serv, Nordre Fasanvej 57-59, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[6] Stolpegard Psychotherapy Ctr, Mental Hlth Serv, Stolpegardsvej 20, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark
[7] Mental Hlth Ctr North Zealand, Mental Hlth Serv, Dyrehavevej 48, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[8] Aarhus Univ, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Mental Hlth Ctr Copenhagen, Inst Clin Med, Mental Hlth Serv, Kildegardsvej 28, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
关键词
Mood disorders; Depression; Collaborative care; Shared care; Detection of depression; General practice; Illness recognition; Cluster randomised trial; ANXIETY DISORDERS; MAJOR DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; RISK; RELIABILITY; INVENTORY; REGISTER; VERSION; DESIGN; TREAT;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-2064-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Depression is a common illness with great human costs and a significant burden on the public economy. Previous studies have indicated that collaborative care (CC) has a positive effect on symptoms when provided to people with depression, but CC has not yet been applied in a Danish context. We therefore developed a model for CC (the Collabri model) to treat people with depression in general practice in Denmark. Since systematic identification of patients is an "active ingredient" in CC and some literature suggests case finding as the best alternative to standard detection, the two detection methods are examined as part of the study. The aim is to investigate if treatment according to the Collabri model has an effect on depression symptoms when provided to people with depression in general practice in Denmark, and to examine if case finding is a better method to detect depression in general practice than standard detection. Methods/Design: The trial is a cluster-randomised, clinical superiority trial investigating the effect of treatment according to the Collabri model for CC, compared to treatment as usual for 480 participants diagnosed with depression in general practice in the Capital Region of Denmark. The primary outcome is depression symptoms (Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II)) after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include depression symptoms (BDI-II) after 15 months, anxiety symptoms (Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI)), level of functioning (Global Assessment of Function (GAF)) and psychological stress (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)). In addition, case finding (with the recommended screening tool Major Depression Inventory (MDI)) and standard detection of depression is examined in a cluster-randomized controlled design. Here, the primary outcome is the positive predictive value of referral diagnosis. Discussion: If the Collabri model is shown to be superior to treatment as usual, the study will contribute with important knowledge on how to improve treatment of depression in general practice, with major benefit to patients and society. If case finding is shown to be superior to standard detection, it will be recommended as the detection method in future treatment according to the Collabri model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis [J].
Adams, G ;
Gulliford, MC ;
Ukoumunne, OC ;
Eldridge, S ;
Chinn, S ;
Campbell, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (08) :785-794
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DIAGN BEH KLIN VEJL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IMPROVED PATIENT COU
[4]   Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems [J].
Archer, Janine ;
Bower, Peter ;
Gilbody, Simon ;
Lovell, Karina ;
Richards, David ;
Gask, Linda ;
Dickens, Chris ;
Coventry, Peter .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (10)
[5]   Screening for depression in high-risk groups: prospective cohort study in general practice [J].
Baas, Kim D. ;
Wittkampf, Karin A. ;
van Weert, Henk C. ;
Lucassen, Peter ;
Huyser, Jochanan ;
van den Hoogen, Henk ;
van de Lisdonk, Eloy ;
Bindels, Patrick E. ;
Bockting, Claudi L. ;
Ruhe, Henricus G. ;
Schene, Aart H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 194 (05) :399-403
[6]   The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity [J].
Bech, P ;
Rasmussen, NA ;
Olsen, LR ;
Noerholm, V ;
Abildgaard, W .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 66 (2-3) :159-164
[7]  
Bech P., 2004, Quality of Life Newsletter, V32, P15
[8]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[9]  
Bertelsen A., 2000, WHO ICD 10 MENTAL BE
[10]   Collaborative care for depression in primary care - Making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression [J].
Bower, Peter ;
Gilbody, Simon ;
Richards, David ;
Fletcher, Janine ;
Sutton, Alex .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 189 :484-493