Survival of dental implants and occurrence of osteoradionecrosis in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:34
作者
Toneatti, Daniel Jan [1 ]
Graf, Ronny Roger [1 ]
Burkhard, John-Patrik [1 ]
Schaller, Benoit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Inselspital, Dept Craniomaxillofacial Surg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Radiotherapy; Dental implants; Osteoradionecrosis; Mandibular reconstruction; Bone grafting; Hyperbaric oxygenation; ABLATIVE TUMOR SURGERY; FIBULA FREE-FLAP; ORAL-CANCER; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; REHABILITATION; RECONSTRUCTION; BONE; RADIOTHERAPY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-021-04065-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This systematic review assesses dental implant survival, calculates the incidence rate of osteoradionecrosis, and evaluates risk factors in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Materials and methods Various databases (e.g., Medline/Embase using Ovid) and gray literature platforms were searched using a combination of keywords and subject headings. When appropriate, meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Otherwise, pooled analysis was applied. Results A total of 425 of the 660 included patients received radiotherapy. In total, 2602 dental implants were placed, and 1637 were placed in irradiated patients. Implant survival after an average follow-up of 37.7 months was 97% (5% confidence interval, CI 95.2%, 95% CI 98.3%) in nonirradiated patients and 91.9% (5% CI 87.7%, 95% CI: 95.3%) after an average follow-up of 39.8 months in irradiated patients. Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 11 cases, leading to an incidence of 3% (5% CI 1.6%, 95% CI 4.9%). The main factors impacting implant survival were radiation and grafting status, while factors influencing osteoradionecrosis could not be determined using meta-analysis. Conclusion Our data show that implant survival in irradiated patients is lower than in nonirradiated patients, and osteoradionecrosis is-while rare-a serious complication that any OMF surgeon should be prepared for. The key to success could be a standardized patient selection and therapy to improve the standard of care, reduce risks and shorten treatment time.
引用
收藏
页码:5579 / 5593
页数:15
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Mandibular dental implant placement immediately after teeth removal in head and neck cancer patients [J].
Alberga, Jamie M. ;
Korfage, Anke ;
Bonnema, Ilse ;
Witjes, Max J. H. ;
Vissink, Arjan ;
Raghoebar, Gerry M. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (12) :5911-5918
[2]  
Altman DG, 2004, POOLING DATA IS NOT
[3]  
Andersson G, 1998, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V13, P647
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004152
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]
[6]   Use of the fixed mandibular implant in oral cancer patients: A retrospective study [J].
August, M ;
Bast, B ;
Jackson, M ;
Perrott, D .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (03) :297-301
[7]  
Barber H D, 1995, Implant Dent, V4, P111, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199505000-00006
[8]   Meta-analysis of prevalence [J].
Barendregt, Jan J. ;
Doi, Suhail A. ;
Lee, Yong Yi ;
Norman, Rosana E. ;
Vos, Theo .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 67 (11) :974-978
[9]  
Bodard A G, 2006, Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac, V107, P137, DOI 10.1016/S0035-1768(06)77007-3
[10]   Simple pooling versus combining in meta-analysis [J].
Bravata, DM ;
Olkin, I .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (02) :218-230