Optimal load balancing and assessment of existing load balancing criteria

被引:0
|
作者
Boulmier, Anthony [1 ]
Abdennadher, Nabil [2 ]
Chopard, Bastien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Dept Comp Sci, Route Drize 7, CH-1227 Carouge, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Western Switzerland HES SO, Rue Prairie 4, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
High performance computing; Parallel computing; Dynamic load balancing; Load balancing criteria; Performance optimization; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.07.002
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Parallel iterative applications often suffer from load imbalance, one of the most critical performance degradation factors. Hence, load balancing techniques are used to distribute the workload evenly to maximize performance. A key challenge is to know when to use load balancing techniques. In general, this is done through load balancing criteria, which trigger load balancing based on runtime application data and/or user-defined information. In the first part of this paper, we introduce a novel, automatic load balancing criterion derived from a simple mathematical model. In the second part, we propose a branch-and-bound algorithm to find the load balancing iterations that lead to the optimal application performance. This algorithm finds the optimal load balancing scenario in polynomial time while, to the best of our knowledge, it has never been addressed in less than an exponential time. Finally, we compare the performance of the scenarios produced by state-of-the-art load balancing criteria relative to the optimal load balancing scenario in synthetic benchmarks and parallel N-body simulations. In the synthetic benchmarks, we observe that the proposed criterion outperforms the other automatic criteria. In the numerical experiments, we show that our new criterion is, on average, 4.9% faster than state-of-the-art load balancing criteria and can outperform them by up to 17.6%. Moreover, we see in the numerical study that the state-of-the-art automatic criteria are at worst 26.43% slower than the optimum and at best 10% slower. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 225
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EBGO: an optimal load balancing algorithm, a solution for existing tribulation to balance the load efficiently on cloud servers
    Velpula, Prasad
    Pamula, Rajendra
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 81 (24) : 34653 - 34675
  • [2] EBGO: an optimal load balancing algorithm, a solution for existing tribulation to balance the load efficiently on cloud servers
    Prasad Velpula
    Rajendra Pamula
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2022, 81 : 34653 - 34675
  • [3] Hydrodynamic load balancing
    Hui, CC
    Chanson, ST
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 1999, 10 (11) : 1118 - 1137
  • [4] Toward informed partitioning for load balancing: A proof-of-concept
    Boulmier, Anthony
    Abdennadher, Nabil
    Chopard, Bastien
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 61
  • [5] Hierarchical Load Balancing Model by Optimal Resource Utilization
    Patni, Jagdish Chandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ANALYTICS, 2019, 6 (03) : 29 - 42
  • [6] Dynamic Load Balancing with Pair Potentials
    Papin, Jean-Charles
    Denoual, Christophe
    Colombet, Laurent
    Namyst, Raymond
    EURO-PAR 2014: PARALLEL PROCESSING WORKSHOPS, PT II, 2014, 8806 : 462 - 473
  • [7] Modeling of optimal load balancing strategy using queueing theory
    Spies, F
    MICROPROCESSING AND MICROPROGRAMMING, 1996, 41 (8-9): : 555 - 570
  • [8] An Optimal Distributed Load Balancing Algorithm for Homogeneous Work Units
    Langer, Akhil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUPERCOMPUTING, (ICS'14), 2014, : 165 - 165
  • [9] A Mathematical Model for Load Balancing
    Oliveira, Suely
    Soma, Takako
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 2: ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 1148 : 824 - +
  • [10] Load Balancing in Control Allocation
    Bodson, Marc
    Frost, Susan A.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2011, 34 (02) : 380 - 387