WHAT IS THE LEVEL OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING FOR RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT IN ROMANIA?

被引:0
|
作者
Ioana-Toroimac, Gabriela [1 ]
Zaharia, Liliana [1 ]
Morosanu, Gabriela Adina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Fac Geog, Blvd Nicolae Balcescu 1, Bucharest 010041, Romania
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP,IGE, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[3] Romanian Acad, Inst Geog, Str Dimitrie Racovita 12, Bucharest 023994, Romania
来源
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WATER RESOURCES AND WETLANDS | 2018年
关键词
public participation; River Basin Management Plan; stakeholders; governance; Romania; EU WATER FRAMEWORK; HYDROMORPHOLOGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The governance through public participation in the decision making process is encouraged by the Water Framework Directive. In order to understand the characteristics of this water governance issue in Romania, our study investigates the public's response to consultation actions during the elaboration of the second cycle of the national River Basin Management Plan. We therefore searched to answer two main questions: i) which actors took part in public consultation actions and ii) what kind of suggestions did they make? The analysis is based on information published in the annexes of the River Basin Management Plan from which we extracted participating actors and their commentaries. We found that, among actors, public authorities were dominant (67%), followed by stakeholders from the economic sector (23%), NGOs (5%) and research and education actors (3%). Only 35% of them brought suggestions, the most active being the public authorities and NGOs. They referred mostly to the Programme of Measures by identifying problems related to various types of water pollution (biologic, by nutrients or priority substances - 41%) and river dynamics (erosion, floods - 25%), together with the necessary measures to be taken. Among methodological issues (16%), some commentaries about the prioritization protocol from the Programme of Measures were made. Even if there were fewer commentaries on governance issues (11%), we found suggestions concerning the necessity to better connect actors to each other and to improve public information/education/ awareness. When compared to studies conducted on the same subject in other states of the European Union, we found a similar part of involvement of the public in river basin management (e.g. consultation, proactively involvement of public authorities instead of NGOs). The suggestions brought by the actors appear to be relevant for the river basin management in Romania, therefore higher forms of cooperation between actors from various sectors should be strongly encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Water Framework Directive Implementation in Greece: Introducing Participation in Water Governance - the Case of the Evrotas River Basin Management Plan
    Demetropoulou, Leeda
    Nikolaidis, Nikolaos
    Papadoulakis, Vasilis
    Tsakiris, Kostas
    Koussouris, Theodore
    Kalogerakis, Nikolaos
    Koukaras, Kostas
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2010, 20 (05) : 336 - 349
  • [42] The Strengths and Weaknesses of Deliberation on River Basin Management Planning: Analysing the water framework directive implementation in Catalonia (Spain)
    Pares, Marc
    Brugue, Quim
    Espluga, Josep
    Miralles-de-Imperial, Julia
    Ballester, Alba
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2015, 25 (02) : 97 - 110
  • [43] A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?
    Reed, Mark S.
    Vella, Steven
    Challies, Edward
    de Vente, Joris
    Frewer, Lynne
    Hohenwallner-Ries, Daniela
    Huber, Tobias
    Neumann, Rosmarie K.
    Oughton, Elizabeth A.
    del Ceno, Julian Sidoli
    van Delden, Hedwig
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 : S7 - S17
  • [44] Construction and Demonstration of the Evaluation System of Public Participation Level in Urban Planning Based on the Participatory Video of 'General Will-Particular Will'
    Wang, Zongxiang
    Chen, Tianhao
    Li, Wei
    Zhang, Kai
    Qi, Jianwu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [45] River Management and Stakeholders' Participation: The case of the Rhone River, a fragmented institutional setting
    Brethaut, Christian
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2016, 26 (04) : 292 - 305
  • [46] THE ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF WASTE AT THE LEVEL OF ROMANIA
    Balu, Petronela Evelina
    Negescu Oancea, Mihaela Diana
    Georgescu, Raluca
    Luchian, Iuliana
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2019, 20 : 456 - 459
  • [47] The herpetofauna from the Bistrita river basin (Romania): geographical distribution
    Gherghel, Iulian
    Strugariu, Alexandru
    Ghiurca, Daniel
    Cicort-Lucaciu, Alfred-Stefan
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2008, 4 : S71 - S103
  • [48] Public participation for bulk water charge: Paraiba River Basin Committee (Brazil) and Alentejo Hydrographic Region Council (Portugal) cases study
    de Freitas Magero Ribeiro, Maria Adriana
    Rios Ribeiro, Marcia Maria
    Varanda, Marta Pedro
    RBRH-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE RECURSOS HIDRICOS, 2016, 21 (04): : 777 - 788
  • [49] Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation
    Laurie Pearce
    Natural Hazards, 2003, 28 : 211 - 228
  • [50] Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation
    Pearce, L
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2003, 28 (2-3) : 211 - 228