Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning

被引:168
作者
Feeney, BC [1 ]
Collins, NL
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
motivation; caregiving; social support; couples;
D O I
10.1177/0146167203252807
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study identified and examined the correlates of specific motivations for caregiving in romantic couples (N = 194 couples). At Time 1, couple members completed measures assessing motivations for caregiving, the quality of caregiving that occurs in the relationship, and personal and relationship characteristics that might influence caregiving motivations. Relationship functioning was then assessed 2 to 3 months later. Results revealed that (a) there are a number of distinct motivations for providing and for not providing care to one's partner, (b) the motivations are associated with various personal features of the caregiver and the recipient, (c) the caregiver's perceptions of the relationship influence his or her caregiving motives, (d) different motivations for caregiving predict different patterns of caregiving behavior, and (e) responsive caregiving predicts the recipient's perceptions of healthy relationship functioning both immediately and over time. Implications of identifying the motivations that promote or inhibit the provision of responsive support in intimate relationships are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:950 / 968
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF GENDER-ROLE EXPECTATIONS ON THE SOCIAL SUPPORT PROCESS [J].
BARBEE, AP ;
CUNNINGHAM, MR ;
WINSTEAD, BA ;
DERLEGA, VJ ;
GULLEY, MR ;
YANKEELOV, PA ;
DRUEN, PB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1993, 49 (03) :175-190
[2]   ATTACHMENT STYLES AMONG YOUNG-ADULTS - A TEST OF A 4-CATEGORY MODEL [J].
BARTHOLOMEW, K ;
HOROWITZ, LM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) :226-244
[3]  
Batson C.D., 1991, ALTRUISM QUESTION SO
[4]   EMPATHIC JOY AND THE EMPATHY ALTRUISM HYPOTHESIS [J].
BATSON, CD ;
BATSON, JG ;
SLINGSBY, JK ;
HARRELL, KL ;
PEEKNA, HM ;
TODD, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (03) :413-426
[5]  
Bowlby J., 1982, ATTACHMENT LOSS ATTA
[6]  
Brennan K. A., 1998, ATTACHMENT THEORY CL, P46, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAIN.2006.07.020
[7]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[8]   Emergent integration in contemporary personality psychology [J].
Carver, CS .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1996, 30 (03) :319-334
[9]   EMPATHY-BASED HELPING - IS IT SELFLESSLY OR SELFISHLY MOTIVATED [J].
CIALDINI, RB ;
SCHALLER, M ;
HOULIHAN, D ;
ARPS, K ;
FULTZ, J ;
BEAMAN, AL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (04) :749-758
[10]  
COHEN S, 1985, SOCIAL SUPPORT SKILL