Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions

被引:109
作者
Brown, Gregory B. [1 ]
Currier, G. Frans [1 ]
Kadioglu, Onur [1 ]
Kierl, J. Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Dent, Dept Orthodont, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
关键词
ALGINATE IMPRESSIONS; LINEAR MEASUREMENTS; REPRODUCIBILITY; PLASTER; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.009
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: A rapidly advancing digital technology in orthodontics is 3-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing, prompting a transition from a more traditional clinical workflow toward an almost exclusively digital format. There is limited literature on the accuracy of the 3D printed dental models. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of 2 types of 3D printing techniques. Methods: Digital and alginate impressions of the oral environment were collected from 30 patients. Subsequently, digital impressions were used to print 3D models using digital light processing (DLP) and polyjet printing techniques, and alginate impressions were poured up in stone. Measurements for the 3 model types (digital, DLP, and polyjet) were compared with the stone models. Tooth measurements (first molar to first molar) included mesiodistal (crown width) and incisal/occlusalgingival (crown height). Arch measurements included arch depth and intercanine and intermolar widths. Intraobserver reliability of the repeated measurement error was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients were high for all recorded measurements, indicating that all measurements on all model types were highly reproducible. There were high degrees of agreement between all sets of models and all measurements, with the exception of the crown height measurements between the stone and DLP models, where the mean difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Both the DLP and polyjet printers produced clinically acceptable models and should be considered viable options for clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 739
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models [J].
Akyalcin, Sercan ;
Cozad, Benjamin E. ;
English, Jeryl D. ;
Colville, Clark D. ;
Laman, Stephen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 144 (06) :916-922
[2]  
Bell A, 2003, J Orthod, V30, P219, DOI 10.1093/ortho/30.3.219
[3]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[4]   Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases [J].
Camardella, Leonardo Tavares ;
Vilella, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos ;
Breuning, Hero .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (06) :1178-1187
[5]  
Carmer S., 2017, The Free Beginner's Guide
[6]  
Chua CheeKai., 2003, RAPID PROTOTYPING PR, DOI 10.1142/5064
[7]   Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study [J].
Cuperus, Anne Margreet R. ;
Harms, Marit C. ;
Rangel, Frits A. ;
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. ;
Schols, Jan G. J. H. ;
Breuning, K. Hero .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (03) :308-313
[8]  
Dalstra M, 2009, J ORTHOD, V36, P36, DOI 10.1179/14653120722905
[9]   Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review [J].
Fleming, P. S. ;
Marinho, V. ;
Johal, A. .
ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (01) :1-16
[10]   Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner [J].
Fluegge, Tabea V. ;
Schlager, Stefan ;
Nelson, Katja ;
Nahles, Susanne ;
Metzger, Marc C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 144 (03) :471-478