Development of a Priority Weights-Based Green Building Rating Model

被引:15
作者
Pushpakumara, B. H. J. [1 ]
Thusitha, G. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Sir John Kotelawala Def Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Ratmalana 10390, Sri Lanka
关键词
Green buildings; Rating system; Priority weights; Sustainable development; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; SYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000465
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Green building rating systems are developed to promote sustainability. Existing rating systems use both numerical and linguistic descriptors. In addition, existing rating systems do not directly identify the priority or interrelation between different parameters. The objectives of this study are to develop a priority weights-based green building rating model with numerical descriptors and to propose a remediation plan for existing buildings to obtain green certification under the developed rating model. In this paper, the analytical hierarchy process is used to develop a green building rating system. Based on the opinions of 100 experts, the priority weights of parameters were determined. The numerical thresholds of point allocation, equations, and priority weights of the proposed rating model supports a definitive classification on green building performance. For buildings with poor green performance, a remediation plan is proposed that can be adopted to upgrade and obtain green certification for buildings under the developed rating model. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using Analytic Hierarchy Process - The case of Egypt
    AbdelAzim, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Mohamed
    Aboul-Zahab, Essam Mohamed
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 71 : 414 - 425
  • [2] Design of A Sustainable Building: A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Sustainability in the Building Sector
    Akadiri, Peter O.
    Chinyio, Ezekiel A.
    Olomolaiye, Paul O.
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2012, 2 (02) : 126 - 152
  • [3] Akdag HaticeCamgoz., 2017, Int. J. Supply Chain Manag, V6, P174
  • [4] Al-Subhi Al-Harbi K. M., 2001, International Journal of Project Management, V19, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, DOI DOI 10.1080/01966324.1982.10737095
  • [6] AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD - AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION
    ARMACOST, RL
    COMPONATION, PJ
    MULLENS, MA
    SWART, WW
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (04) : 72 - 79
  • [7] Atputharajah, 2013, SUSTAINABLE DEV GREE
  • [8] Life cycle carbon dioxide assessment tool for buildings in the schematic design phase
    Baek, Cheonghoon
    Park, Sang-Hoon
    Suzuki, Michiya
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 61 : 275 - 287
  • [9] Bhatt R., 2010, World Applied Sciences Journal, V8, P881
  • [10] BRE Global (Building Research Establishment Global), 2015, BREEAM BUILD RES EST