Breast reduction: Safe in the morbidly obese?

被引:73
作者
Roehl, Kendall [1 ]
Craig, E. Stirling [1 ]
Gomez, Victoria [1 ]
Phillips, Linda G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Galveston, Med Branch, Div Plast Surg, Dept Surg, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d60f4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With an increasing obese population, plastic surgeons are consulted by women requesting larger breast reductions, with body mass indices in the obese to morbidly obese range (30 to >= 40 kg/m(2)) and breasts considered gigantomastic (> 2000 g resected from each breast). There have been few descriptions of outcomes in the morbidly obese population. Previous literature reports high complication rates in obese women and large-volume breast reductions. Methods: Retrospective investigation of 179 reduction mammaplasty patients was performed out to determine whether reduction mass, age, body mass index, smoking, method used (i.e., vertical pedicle, inferior pedicle/central mound, or free nipple graft), and comorbidities influenced complication rates. The patients were categorized by size of reduction, age, and body mass index. Results: The overall complication rate was 50 percent. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of complications attributable to size of reduction, age, or body mass index (p = 0.37, p = 0.13, and p = 0.38, respectively). Also, smoking status, method used (p = 0.65 and p = 0.17, and p = 0.48 and p = 0.1, respectively) and comorbidities had no effect on complication rates (reduction size, p = 0.054; age, p = 0.12; and body mass index, p = 0.072). There was no significant increase in the rate of complications for each body mass index group based on the reduction mass (p = 0.75, p = 0.89, p = 0.23, and p = 0.07). Conclusion: It is as safe to perform large-volume breast reductions in the morbidly obese patient with comorbidities as in anyone else.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 378
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 2002, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]   Is it justified to refuse breast reduction to smokers? [J].
Bikhchandani, J. ;
Varma, S. K. ;
Henderson, H. P. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2007, 60 (09) :1050-1054
[3]   Reduction mammaplasty: The results of avoiding nipple-areolar amputation in cases of extreme hypertrophy [J].
Chang, P ;
Shaaban, AF ;
Canady, JW ;
Ricciardelli, EJ ;
Cram, AE .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1996, 37 (06) :585-591
[4]   Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study [J].
Cunningham, BL ;
Gear, AJL ;
Kerrigan, CL ;
Collins, ED .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (06) :1597-1604
[5]   REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY - AN OUTCOME ANALYSIS [J].
DABBAH, A ;
LEHMAN, JA ;
PARKER, MG ;
TANTRI, D ;
WAGNER, DS .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1995, 35 (04) :337-341
[6]   Large-volume reduction mammaplasty - The effect of body mass index on postoperative complications [J].
Gamboa-Bobadilla, G. Mabel ;
Killingsworth, Christopher .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 58 (03) :246-249
[7]   Avoiding free nipple grafting with the inferior pedicle technique [J].
Gerzenshtein, J ;
Oswald, T ;
McCluskey, P ;
Caplan, J ;
Angel, MF .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 55 (03) :245-249
[8]   COMPLICATIONS OF REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY - COMPARISON OF NIPPLE-AREOLAR GRAFT AND PEDICLE [J].
HAWTOF, DB ;
LEVINE, M ;
KAPETANSKY, DI ;
PIEPER, D .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1989, 23 (01) :3-10
[9]   BREAST REDUCTION FOR SYMPTOMATIC MACROMASTIA - CAN OBJECTIVE PREDICTORS FOR OPERATIVE SUCCESS BE IDENTIFIED [J].
MILLER, AP ;
ZACHER, JB ;
BERGGREN, RB ;
FALCONE, RE ;
MONK, J .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 95 (01) :77-83
[10]   A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty [J].
O'Grady, KF ;
Thoma, A ;
Dal Cin, A .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (03) :736-742