Natural History of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of Factors Related to Clinical Events and Intervention

被引:40
作者
Olvera-Posada, Daniel
Ali, Sohrab Naushad
Dion, Marie
Alenezi, Husain
Denstedt, John D.
Razvi, Hassan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, St Josephs Hosp, Div Urol,Dept Surg, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
关键词
TERM-FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; ERA;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine the natural history of residual fragments (RF) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in long-term patient follow-up and to identify possible predictive factors for future intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed all patients from 2006 to 2013 with postoperative computed tomography scan revealing RF, who did not undergo second-look nephroscopy or immediate ancillary procedures, and with at least 12 months of clinical follow-up. We evaluated factors associated with clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate the proportion of asymptomatic and treatment-free patients during follow-up. RESULTS From 781 percutaneous nephrolithotomies performed, 202 patients underwent postoperative computed tomography scan and 44 patients with residual stones were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 57.9 months. A total of 24 patients (54.5%) developed at least 1 clinical outcome, and 32 (72.7%) patients had a surgical intervention. Only 4 patients had radiological evidence of stone passage. Multivariate analysis found that RF >4 mm and struvite or apatite stones were significant predictors for surgical intervention. The 5-year estimated probability to remain intervention free was 29%. CONCLUSION Despite the size of the RF, the vast majority of patients required an intervention during long-term follow-up. We identified that RFs of diameter >4 mm associate with the need for a surgical therapy, but the rate of clinical events was not affected by the size or location of the stones. Struvite or apatite composition stones had an increased risk of intervention during follow-up. Spontaneous passage was an uncommon event in this cohort. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 50
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Medium-Term Follow-Up [J].
Altunrende, Fatih ;
Tefekli, Ahmet ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Yuruk, Emrah ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
Binbay, Murat ;
Muslumanoglu, Ahmet Y. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) :941-945
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GUIDELINES UROLITHIA
[4]   Initial Experience and Comparative Efficacy of the UreTron: A New Intracorporeal Ultrasonic Lithotriptor [J].
Borofsky, Michael S. ;
El Tayeb, Marawan M. ;
Paonessa, Jessica E. ;
Lingeman, James E. .
UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (06) :1279-1283
[5]  
Chew BH, 2016, J UROLOGY, P3
[6]   The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, Complications, and Outcomes in 5803 Patients [J].
de la Rosette, Jean ;
Assimos, Dean ;
Desai, Mahesh ;
Gutierrez, Jorge ;
Lingeman, James ;
Scarpa, Roberto ;
Tefekli, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) :11-17
[7]   Use of the Acoustic Shadow Width to Determine Kidney Stone Size with Ultrasound [J].
Dunmire, Barbrina ;
Harper, Jonathan D. ;
Cunitz, Bryan W. ;
Lee, Franklin C. ;
Hsi, Ryan ;
Liu, Ziyue ;
Bailey, Michael R. ;
Sorensen, Mathew D. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (01) :171-176
[8]   PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc [J].
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Bhattu, Amit Satish ;
Desai, Mahesh .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (02) :235-240
[9]   Trends in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Use and Outcomes in the United States [J].
Ghani, Khurshid R. ;
Sammon, Jesse D. ;
Bhojani, Naeem ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Sukumar, Shyam ;
Littleton, Ray ;
Peabody, James O. ;
Menon, Mani ;
Quoc-Dien Trinh .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) :558-564
[10]   Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: Reality or myth? [J].
Khaitan, A ;
Gupta, NP ;
Hemal, AK ;
Dogra, PN ;
Seth, A ;
Aron, M .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (01) :20-24