Decision-making in ADHD: sensitive to frequency but blind to the magnitude of penalty?

被引:54
作者
Luman, Marjolein [1 ,2 ]
Oosterlaan, Jaap [1 ,2 ]
Knol, Dirk L. [3 ]
Sergeant, Joseph A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Neuropsychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] PI Res, Dept Neuropsychol, Duivendrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ADHD; decision-making; feedback; penalty; reward;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01910.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: Decision-making and reinforcement sensitivity were investigated in 23 children with ADHD and 20 healthy controls using a gambling paradigm. Methods: Children were required to choose between three alternatives that carried (A) small rewards and small penalties (advantageous), (B) large rewards and increasing penalties and (C) small rewards and increasing penalties (both disadvantageous). Penalties increased either in frequency or magnitude in two independent conditions. Heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) were measured to examine whether impaired decision-making was accompanied by autonomic abnormalities. Results: Children with ADHD showed a maladaptive response style compared to controls by demonstrating a smaller preference for the advantageous alternative, when penalties increased in magnitude. When penalties increased in frequency, children with ADHD performed like controls. Group differences in decision-making attenuated after the task was administered twice. Compared to controls, performance of children with ADHD in the magnitude condition was accompanied by increased HR acceleration following reward. In this condition, the post-selection SC of children with ADHD was larger for advantageous than for disadvantageous alternatives, in contrast to controls who showed an opposite SC pattern. Conclusions: The current findings suggest that during decision-making, children with ADHD may be sensitive to the frequency but blind to the magnitude of penalty.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 722
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AGRESTI A., 2019, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
APA, 1994, DSM 4 DIAGN STAT MAN
[3]   INSENSITIVITY TO FUTURE CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING DAMAGE TO HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEX [J].
BECHARA, A ;
DAMASIO, AR ;
DAMASIO, H ;
ANDERSON, SW .
COGNITION, 1994, 50 (1-3) :7-15
[4]   Young adult outcome of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a controlled 10-year follow-up study [J].
Biederman, J ;
Monuteaux, MC ;
Mick, E ;
Spencer, T ;
Wilens, TE ;
Silva, JM ;
Snyder, LE ;
Faraone, SV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (02) :167-179
[5]   The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex [J].
Damasio, AR .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 351 (1346) :1413-1420
[6]   Neural substrates of decision making in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Ernst, M ;
Kimes, AS ;
London, ED ;
Matochik, JA ;
Eldreth, D ;
Tata, S ;
Contoreggi, C ;
Leff, M ;
Bolla, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 160 (06) :1061-1070
[7]  
FIRESTONE P, 1975, J ABNORM CHILD PSYCH, V3, P201
[8]   PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY - A MOTIVATIONAL APPROACH [J].
FOWLES, DC .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 25 (04) :373-391
[9]  
Garon Nancy, 2006, J Atten Disord, V9, P607, DOI 10.1177/1087054705284501
[10]   Hot and cool aspects of cognitive control in children with ADHD: Decision-making and inhibition [J].
Geurts, Hilde M. ;
van der Oord, Saskia ;
Crone, Eveline A. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 34 (06) :813-824