Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing

被引:14
作者
Courtney, Matthew [1 ]
Costley, Jamie [2 ]
Baldwin, Matthew [3 ]
Lee, Kyungmee [4 ]
Fanguy, Mik [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nazarbayev Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Nur Sultan, Kazakhstan
[2] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Inst Educ, Moscow, Russia
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Sch Digital Humanities & Computat Social Sci, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Univ Lancaster, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster LA1, England
[5] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Digital Humanities & Computat Social Sci, 291 Daehak Ro,Guseong Dong, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
Note; -taking; Collaborative learning; Collaboration; Korea; Academic writing; LECTURE NOTES; NOTETAKING; LONGHAND; LAPTOP; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There is research showing benefits to both collaboration and note-taking, but a lack of research into how they may both work together in an online context. More specifically, there is a gap in the research looking at how collaborative note-taking and individual note-taking can be compared when considering the quality of the notes taken, and how note-quality can impact student performance. The present study looks at the online note-taking behavior and performance of 186 graduate students studying at a Korean university. The results indicate that students who collaborate perform better than individual note-takers on measures of recall of course content, but that individual note-takers perform better on tasks focused on academic writing. Furthermore, the findings suggest that note-quality has no effect on collaborative note-takers' recall of course content, and a slight negative impact on their writing, while individual note-takers benefit from higher quality notes for both recall and writing.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Model-Based Characterization of Text Discourse Content to Evaluate Online Group Collaboration [J].
Adeniran, Adetunji ;
Masthoff, Judith ;
Beacham, Nigel .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2019, PT II, 2019, 11626 :3-8
[2]   MEMORY FOR A LECTURE - EFFECTS OF NOTES, LECTURE RATE, AND INFORMATIONAL DENSITY [J].
AIKEN, EG ;
THOMAS, GS ;
SHENNUM, WA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 67 (03) :439-444
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1054972.1055046, 10.1145/1054972.1055046]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology
[5]   A Comparative Study of Handwriting and Computer Typing in Note-taking by University Students [J].
Aragon-Mendizabal, Estibaliz ;
Delgado-Casas, Candida ;
Navarro-Guzman, Jose-I. ;
Menacho-Jimenez, Inmaculada ;
Romero-Oliva, Manuel-F. .
COMUNICAR, 2016, 24 (48) :101-107
[6]   The Effects of Collaborative Note-Taking in Flipped Learning Contexts [J].
Baldwin, Matthew P. ;
Fanguy, Mik ;
Costley, Jamie H. .
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2019, 5 (04) :25-35
[7]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[8]   ENCODING AND EXTERNAL-STORAGE EFFECTS ON WRITING PROCESSES [J].
BENTON, SL ;
KIEWRA, KA ;
WHITFILL, JM ;
DENNISON, R .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 85 (02) :267-280
[9]  
Blau I., 2009, Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2009:Learning in the technological era, P48
[10]   Note-Taking Skills of Middle School Students With and Without Learning Disabilities [J].
Boyle, Joseph R. .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2010, 43 (06) :530-540