Beauty premium or beauty penalty in sharing accommodation situations based on lay theories

被引:32
作者
Li, Yaoqi [1 ]
Peng, Lixin [1 ]
Ma, Shuang [2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoman [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Tourism Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Int Business & Econ, Informat Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Tourism, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Jinan Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Similarity; Physical attractiveness; Lay theories; Perceived trustworthiness; Sharing accommodations; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; SOCIAL-PERCEPTION; 1ST IMPRESSIONS; SELF-CONTROL; TRUST; SIMILARITY; ANTECEDENTS; EMPATHY; TRUSTWORTHINESS; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1108/IJCHM-03-2021-0300
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose Limited research has paid attention to the physical attractiveness stereotype in peer-to-peer sharing accommodation settings. Since the high-risk situations in sharing accommodations, this paper aims to exam whether beauty premium is still relevant in peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation. Design/methodology/approach The mixed method, including 2,506 secondary data analysis and two scenario experiments, is carried out to test the research framework. Findings The results show that both beauty premium and beauty penalty exist in the e-commerce context. Excessively high attractiveness and plain looking of hosts are likely to decrease consumers' booking decision while moderately attractive hosts will stimulate more booking behaviors. Moreover, perceived trustworthiness mediates the effect of physical attractiveness on booking decision. Additionally, similarity between hosts and consumers plays a moderating role in the relationship between physical attractiveness and perceived trustworthiness. Research limitations/implications This study reveals the physical attractiveness stereotype effects in P2P accommodation and carry implications to P2P platforms and hosts for providing moderately attractive profile photos, enhancing trustworthiness and similarity between hosts and consumers. Further studies can investigate the robustness of the findings as well as more possible reasons for its occurrence. Originality/value The research provides a clearer understanding of physical attractiveness stereotype effect in peer-to-peer sharing accommodation platforms. Besides, the linkage between physical attractiveness and perceived trustworthiness is dynamic; a high host - consumer similarity weakens the negative impact of both excessively high attractiveness and plain looking on consumers' perceived trustworthiness.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 950
页数:22
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers [J].
Batson, CD ;
Lishner, DA ;
Cook, J ;
Sawyer, S .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 27 (01) :15-25
[5]   Smiling Signals Intrinsic Motivation [J].
Cheng, Yimin ;
Mukhopadhyay, Anirban ;
Williams, Patti .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (05) :915-935
[6]   Why travelers switch to the sharing accommodation platforms? A push-pull-mooring framework [J].
Chi, Maomao ;
Wang, Junjing ;
Luo, Xin ;
Li, Han .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 33 (12) :4286-4310
[7]   Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness [J].
Cialdini, RB ;
Brown, SL ;
Lewis, BP ;
Luce, C ;
Neuberg, SL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (03) :481-494
[8]   Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance [J].
Colquitt, Jason A. ;
Scott, Brent A. ;
LePine, Jeffery A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (04) :909-927
[9]   The motives behind consumers' intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation: an fsQCA application [J].
De Canio, Francesca ;
Nieto-Garcia, Marta ;
Martinelli, Elisa ;
Pellegrini, Davide .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 32 (09) :2969-2989
[10]   WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD [J].
DION, K ;
WALSTER, E ;
BERSCHEID, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (03) :285-+