Diabetic foot self-care and concordance of 3 diabetic foot risk stratification systems in a basic health area of Gran Canaria

被引:3
作者
Gonzalez-de la Torre, Hector [1 ]
Luana Quintana-Lorenzo, M. [2 ]
Lorenzo-Navarro, Almudena [2 ]
Jose Suarez-Sanchez, Juan [3 ]
Berenguer-Perez, Miriam [4 ]
Verdu-Soriano, Jose [4 ]
机构
[1] Complejo Hosp Univ Insular Materno Infantil Gran, Serv Canario Salud, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
[2] Serv Canario Salud, ZBS Santa Brigida, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
[3] ZBS Ingenio, Serv Canario Salud, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
[4] Univ Alicante, Fac Ciencias Salud, Dept Enfermeria Comunitaria Med Prevent & Salud P, Alicante, Spain
来源
ENFERMERIA CLINICA | 2020年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
Diabetic foot; Self; -care; Risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.027
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the level of self-care in the population with diabetes and determine the risk of diabetic foot lesions through the use of 3 stratification systems as well as to establish the degree of concordance between these systems. Method: Observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study carried out in the Basic Health Area of Santa Brigida (Gran Canaria-Canary Islands-Spain) in people diagnosed with diabetes (DM Type 1/DM Type 2) (n = 182). Interview, physical examination, review of clinical history and completion of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care questionnaire of the University of Malaga were carried out. The risk stratification was then calculated using 3 systems (System of the National Institute for Health Care Excellence, Classification of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot and High-Risk Diabetic Foot-60-Second Toot(C)-2012). The Kappa index was calculated to study the concordance between systems, the relative risk of negative screening of one method against another was estimated and the exact Fisher test to establish whether there were differences. Results: 30.2% of diabetics had a low level of self-care, 45.1% a medium level and 24.7% a high level. The risk levels calculated were: National Institute for Health Care Excellence Classification (Negative Risk 71.4%-Positive Risk 28.6%), International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Classification (Negative Risk 67.0%-Positive Risk 33.0%) and High-Risk Diabetic Foot-60-Second Tool(C) (Negative Risk 62.6%-Positive Risk 37.4%). Conclusions: All 3 systems have good concordance with each other. The High-Risk Diabetic Foot-60-Second Tool(C) only distinguishes 2 levels of risk but detects a higher percentage of people at risk. The Diabetic Foot Self-Care questionnaire of the University of Malaga may be useful in the context of Primary Care to assess the level of self-care of people with diabetes. (C) 2019 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alonso-Fernández M, 2014, ENDOCRINOL NUTR, V61, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.endonu.2014.01.007
[2]   9. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2016, 39 :S72-S80
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Diabetic foot problems: prevention and management
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INF MUND DIAB
[5]  
Aragon-Sanchez Javier, 2009, Diabetes Res Clin Pract, V86, pe6, DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.06.015
[6]   Type 2 diabetes-related foot care knowledge and foot self-care practice interventions in the United States: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Bonner, Timethia ;
Foster, Margaret ;
Spears-Lanoix, Erica .
DIABETIC FOOT & ANKLE, 2016, 7
[7]   IWGDF guidance on the prevention of foot ulcers in at-risk patients with diabetes [J].
Bus, S. A. ;
van Netten, J. J. ;
Lavery, L. A. ;
Monteiro-Soares, M. ;
Rasmussen, A. ;
Jubiz, Y. ;
Price, P. E. .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2016, 32 :16-24
[8]  
Direccion General de Programas Asistenciales. Consejeria de Sanidad. Servicio Canario de Salud, 2017, GUIA ACT PIE DIAB CA
[9]  
Elías-Viramontes Alma de Coral, 2018, Aquichan, V18, P343, DOI 10.5294/aqui.2018.18.3.8
[10]  
Gonzalez de la Torre H, 2010, GEROKOMOS, V21, P172