Temporal trends in utilization and outcomes of steatotic donor livers in the United States

被引:34
作者
Jackson, Kyle R. [1 ]
Motter, Jennifer D. [1 ]
Haugen, Christine E. [1 ]
Holscher, Courtenay [1 ]
Long, Jane J. [1 ]
Massie, Allan B. [1 ]
Philosophe, Benjamin [1 ]
Cameron, Andrew M. [1 ]
Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline [1 ]
Segev, Dorry L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
关键词
clinical research; practice; donors and donation; deceased; health services and outcomes research; liver transplantation; hepatology; organ procurement; organ procurement and allocation; registry; registry analysis; FATTY LIVER; TRANSPLANTATION; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.15652
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Steatotic donor livers (SDLs) (macrosteatosis >= 30%) represent a possible donor pool expansion, but are frequently discarded due to a historical association with mortality and graft loss. However, changes in recipient/donor demographics, allocation policy, and clinical protocols might have altered utilization and outcomes of SDLs. We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2005 to 2017 and adjusted multilevel regression to quantify temporal trends in discard rates (logistic) and posttransplant outcomes (Cox) of SDLs, accounting for Organ Procurement Organization-level variation. Of 4346 recovered SDLs, 58.0% were discarded in 2005, versus only 43.1% in 2017 (P < .001). SDLs were always substantially more likely discarded versus non-SDLs, although this difference decreased over time (adjusted odds ratio in 2005-2007:(13.15)15.28(17.74); 2008-2011:(11.77)13.41(15.29); 2012-2014:(9.87)11.37(13.10); 2015-2017:(7.79)8.89(10.15), P < .001 for all). Conversely, posttransplant outcomes of recipients of SDLs improved over time: recipients of SDLs from 2012 to 2017 had 46% lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: (0.43)0.54(0.68), P < .001) and 47% lower risk of graft loss (aHR: (0.42)0.53(0.67), P < .001) compared to 2005 to 2011. In fact, in 2012 to 2017, recipients of SDLs had equivalent mortality (aHR: (0.90)1.04(1.21), P = .6) and graft loss (aHR: (0.90)1.04(1.20), P = .6) to recipients of non-SDLs. Increasing utilization of SDLs might be a reasonable strategy to expand the donor pool.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 863
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Effect of graft steatosis on liver function and organ survival after liver transplantation [J].
Angele, Martin K. ;
Rentsch, Markus ;
Hartl, Wolfgang H. ;
Wittmann, Benedikt ;
Graeb, Christian ;
Jauch, Karl Walter ;
Loehe, Florian .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (02) :214-220
[2]   Liver Transplantation Today: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going [J].
Bodzin, Adam S. ;
Baker, Talia B. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (10) :1470-1475
[3]   Safe use of highly steatotic livers by utilizing a donor/recipient clinical algorithm [J].
Chavin, Kenneth D. ;
Taber, David J. ;
Norcross, Melissa ;
Pilch, Nicole A. ;
Crego, Heather ;
McGillicuddy, John W. ;
Bratton, Charles F. ;
Lin, Angello ;
Baliga, Prabhakar K. .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (05) :732-741
[4]   Alcoholic Liver Disease Replaces Hepatitis C Virus Infection as the Leading Indication for Liver Transplantation in the United States [J].
Cholankeril, George ;
Ahmed, Aijaz .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (08) :1356-1358
[5]   Donor Hepatic Steatosis and Outcome After Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review [J].
Chu, Michael J. J. ;
Dare, Anna J. ;
Phillips, Anthony R. J. ;
Bartlett, Adam S. J. R. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (09) :1713-1724
[6]   Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index [J].
de Graaf, Esther L. ;
Kench, James ;
Dilworth, Pamela ;
Shackel, Nicholas A. ;
Strasser, Simone I. ;
Joseph, David ;
Pleass, Henry ;
Crawford, Michael ;
McCaughan, Geoff W. ;
Verran, Deborah J. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) :540-546
[7]   Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Steatotic Liver Transplantation [J].
Doyle, M. B. Majella ;
Vachharajani, Neeta ;
Wellen, Jason R. ;
Anderson, Christopher D. ;
Lowell, Jeffrey A. ;
Shenoy, Surendra ;
Brunt, Elizabeth M. ;
Chapman, William C. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (07) :653-660
[8]   The Drug Overdose Epidemic and Deceased-Donor Transplantation in the United States [J].
Durand, Christine M. ;
Bowring, Mary G. ;
Thomas, Alvin G. ;
Kucirka, Lauren M. ;
Massie, Allan B. ;
Cameron, Andrew ;
Desai, Niraj M. ;
Sulkowski, Mark ;
Segev, Dorry L. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (10) :702-+
[9]   The Use of Fatty Liver Grafts in Modern Allocation Systems Risk Assessment by the Balance of Risk (BAR) Score [J].
Dutkowski, Philipp ;
Schlegel, Andrea ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Oberkofler, Christian E. ;
Adam, Rene ;
Burroughs, Andrew K. ;
Schadde, Eric ;
Muellhaupt, Beat ;
Clavien, Pierre-Alain .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (05) :861-869
[10]   Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014 [J].
Flegal, Katherine M. ;
Kruszon-Moran, Deanna ;
Carroll, Margaret D. ;
Fryar, Cheryl D. ;
Ogden, Cynthia L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (21) :2284-2291