Modelling the complex evaporated gas flow and its impact on particle spattering during laser powder bed fusion

被引:31
作者
Jakumeit, Juergen [1 ]
Zheng, Gongyuan [1 ]
Laqua, Romuald [1 ]
Clark, Samuel J. [2 ,3 ]
Zielinski, Jonas [4 ]
Schleifenbaum, Johannes H. [4 ]
Lee, Peter D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Access eV, Intzestr 5, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
[2] UCL, Dept Mech Engn, London WC1E 7JE, England
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Xray Sci Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chair Digital Addit Prod DAP, Campus Blvd 73, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Additive manufacturing simulation; Laser powder bed fusion; Keyhole dynamics with vapour plume; Particle spattering; Synchrotron X-ray imaging; FLUID-FLOW; HEAT-TRANSFER; DEFECT GENERATION; NUMERICAL-METHOD; STRESS-ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2021.102332
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The additive manufacturing (AM) of metals is becoming an increasingly important production process with the potential to replace traditional techniques such as casting. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is used in many applications to print metal parts from powder. The metal powder is heated locally with sufficient laser radiation that the liquid melt easily reaches its boiling temperature, which leads to a metallic vapour jet that can entrain both powder bed particles and molten droplets. The small size of laser-matter interaction site makes a detailed experimental analysis of the process challenging. Synchrotron X-ray imaging experiments are one of the few methods which can capture the dynamic melting and solidification processes. Comparing such experiments with computer simulations of the process is an important approach in order to better understand the manufacturing process and to analyse the influence of process parameters on the evaporated gas jet and the subsequent impact on particle ejection, leading to potentially reduced AM component quality. The melting and solidification of the metal powder is simulated using an Eulerian multiphase approach based on a control volume discretization of powder bed and substrate and a volume of liquid separation from melt and gas phase. The gas phase modelled as an ideal gas reaches velocities up to 100 m/s. Lagrangian particle tracking in the simulation demonstrates that the velocity fields calculated by the Eulerian multi-phase approach in combination with a standard drag-force model lead to particle accelerations in good agreement with those measured experimentally. In order to avoid numerical laborious Lagrangian calculations, a direct method to compare an Eulerian multiphase simulation with synchrotron X-ray experiments was introduced and validated. This approach is used to analyse the influence of process parameters including laser power and laser speed on the maximal acceleration of particles from the melt pool area. While the particle acceleration increases linearly with line energy in the conduction mode, a linear decrease of the acceleration with increasing line energy can be found in the transition mode before the accel-eration increases again with line energy in the keyhole mode.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   Predictions of misruns using three-phase coupled mold-filling and solidification simulations in low pressure turbine (LPT) blades [J].
Jana, S. ;
Kaettlitz, O. ;
Hediger, F. ;
Jakumeit, J. ;
Aguilar, J. .
MCWASP XIII: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING OF CASTING, WELDING AND ADVANCED SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES, 2012, 33
[22]  
Karapatis NP, 1999, SOL FREEFORM FABRIC, P255
[23]   Controlling interdependent meso-nanosecond dynamics and defect generation inmetal 3D printing [J].
Khairallah, Saad A. ;
Martin, Aiden A. ;
Lee, Jonathan R. I. ;
Guss, Gabe ;
Calta, Nicholas P. ;
Hammons, Joshua A. ;
Nielsen, Michael H. ;
Chaput, Kevin ;
Schwalbach, Edwin ;
Shah, Megna N. ;
Chapman, Michael G. ;
Willey, Trevor M. ;
Rubenchik, Alexander M. ;
Anderson, Andrew T. ;
Wang, Y. Morris ;
Matthews, Manyalibo J. ;
King, Wayne E. .
SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6491) :660-+
[24]   Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder [J].
Khairallah, Saad A. ;
Anderson, Andy .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 214 (11) :2627-2636
[25]   Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges [J].
King, W. E. ;
Anderson, A. T. ;
Ferencz, R. M. ;
Hodge, N. E. ;
Kamath, C. ;
Khairallah, S. A. ;
Rubenchik, A. M. .
APPLIED PHYSICS REVIEWS, 2015, 2 (04)
[26]   Numerical simulation of multi-component evaporation during selective electron beam melting of TiAl [J].
Klassen, Alexander ;
Forster, Vera E. ;
Juechter, Vera ;
Koerner, Carolin .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 247 :280-288
[27]   Evaporation model for beam based additive manufacturing using free surface lattice Boltzmann methods [J].
Klassen, Alexander ;
Scharowsky, Thorsten ;
Koerner, Carolin .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2014, 47 (27)
[28]   THEORETICAL MODELING OF RAPID SURFACE VAPORIZATION WITH BACK PRESSURE [J].
KNIGHT, CJ .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1979, 17 (05) :519-523
[29]   Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion [J].
Lee, Y. S. ;
Zhang, W. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2016, 12 :178-188
[30]   In situ X-ray imaging of defect and molten pool dynamics in laser additive manufacturing [J].
Leung, Chu Lun Alex ;
Marussi, Sebastian ;
Atwood, Robert C. ;
Towrie, Michael ;
Withers, Philip J. ;
Lee, Peter D. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9