Park-People Relationships: The Socioeconomic Monitoring of National Parks in Bavaria, Germany

被引:22
作者
Job, Hubert [1 ]
Bittlingmaier, Sarah [1 ]
Mayer, Marius [2 ]
von Ruschkowski, Eick [3 ]
Woltering, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Geog & Geol, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Strateg Management Mkt & Tourism, Team SME Tourism, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Alfred Toepfer Akad Nat Schutz, D-29640 Schneverdingen, Germany
关键词
park-people relationships; rural tourism; Germany; Bavaria; conflicts; national parks; Berchtesgaden; Bavarian Forest; PROTECTED AREAS; NATURE CONSERVATION; LOCAL-COMMUNITIES; HUMAN DIMENSIONS; TOURISM; ACCEPTANCE; OPPOSITION; IMPACTS; DISTURBANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/su13168984
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Questions about park-people relationships and the understanding and handling of the conflicts that may result from the creation and management of national parks in the surrounding area are prerequisites for both successful park management and sustainable rural tourism development. This paper analyzes the roles that research may play in relation to park-people relationships in the context of the two oldest German national parks located in Bavaria. The different fields of action of national parks are used to identify the potential for conflict, using detailed case studies from the Bavarian Forest and Berchtesgaden National Parks using quantitative population surveys carried out in 2018. The overall attitude towards both national parks is overwhelmingly positive, with trust towards park administrations and the perceived economic benefits from rural tourism being the attitudes most strongly correlated to the overall level of park-people relationships. Nevertheless, some points of contention still exist, like the ecological integrity approach towards strict nature conservation and related landscape changes (e.g., deadwood cover). A comparison over time shows in both cases that the spatial proximity to the protected area negatively influences people's attitudes towards the parks, but less so than in the past. Recommendations for national park management include communicating proactively and with greater transparency with locals and decision-makers, to identify conflicts earlier and, where possible, to eliminate them. Furthermore, developing a standardized method to monitor park-people relationships in Germany is a must and would benefit integrated approaches in research and management based on conservation social science.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Allex B., 2019, BERECHNUNG REGIONALO
[3]  
Balas M., 2021, Messung der Nachhaltigkeit des Tourismus in Deutschland-Entwicklung eines Tourismus-Nachhaltigkeits- Satellitenkontos
[4]  
Bayerischer Rundfunk, 2018, UMFR MEHRH DRITT NAT
[5]  
Beckmann O., 2003, AKZEPTANZ NATIONALPA
[6]   Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation [J].
Bennett, Nathan J. ;
Roth, Robin ;
Klain, Sarah C. ;
Chan, Kai ;
Christie, Patrick ;
Clark, Douglas A. ;
Cullman, Georgina ;
Curran, Deborah ;
Durbin, Trevor J. ;
Epstein, Graham ;
Greenberg, Alison ;
Nelson, Michael P. ;
Sandlos, John ;
Stedman, Richard ;
Teel, Tara L. ;
Thomas, Rebecca ;
Verissimo, Diogo ;
Wyborn, Carina .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 205 :93-108
[7]  
Berzborn S, 2018, GEOGR RUNDSCH, V70, P10
[8]  
BfN (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation), NATL PARKS
[9]  
BMU (Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety), 2007, NATL STRAT BIOL DIV
[10]   Paths of Tension: Development Processes of protected Areas in the Austrian Alps [J].
Braun, Valerie ;
Bendier, Gebhard ;
Haller, Andreas ;
Heinrich, Kati .
REVUE DE GEOGRAPHIE ALPINE-JOURNAL OF ALPINE RESEARCH, 2018, 106 (04)