Accelerated Ponseti technique: efficacy in the management of CTEV

被引:8
作者
Barik, Sitanshu [1 ]
Nazeer, Muhammed [2 ]
Mani, Babloo Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
[2] Kerala Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
[3] Spring Garden Clin, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
关键词
Congenital talipes equinovarus; Standard Ponseti; Accelerated Ponseti; CLUBFOOT DEFORMITY; FOOT; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-018-2353-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current standard practice of treatment for congenital talipes equinus varus (CTEV) is the Ponseti method of manipulation and casting which requires great compliance by caregivers for casting as well as bracing. There is inconclusive evidence regarding optimal cast change interval. This was a prospective non-randomized study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in South India over a 2-year period with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups, one with cast change interval of 7 days and the other group at 3 days. Children with CTEV with age less than 1 year with no previous intervention were included in the study. Functional score devised by Ponseti was determined at final follow-up. The average number of casts in standard and accelerated group was 5.23 +/- 0.59 and 4.72 +/- 0.61 (p<0.01). The average number of days required for correction of feet was 54.38 +/- 8.01 and 33.88 +/- 9.03 (p<0.01) respectively, for standard and accelerated groups. The Pirani score showed a faster reduction in the accelerated group. This study is the longest prospective study published yet in literature, comparing standard and accelerated Ponseti protocols. Complication rate noted in our study was comparable to study by Morcuende but higher than other studies comparing the techniques. It increases compliance as well as reducing treatment and travel costs for parents, more so in developing countries. At 5-year follow-up, there is no significant difference in the functional outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 924
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, E CENT AFR J SURG, DOI DOI 10.4314/ECAJS.V22I1.4
  • [2] Boardman Allison, 2011, Iowa Orthop J, V31, P30
  • [3] Boehm S, 2007, J PEDIATR ORTHOPED, V27, P712, DOI 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181425508
  • [4] Ponseti treatment in the management of clubfoot deformity - a continuing role for paediatric orthopaedic services in secondary care centres
    Docker, Charles E. J.
    Lewthwaite, Simon
    Kiely, Nigel T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2007, 89 (05) : 510 - 512
  • [5] Traditional and accelerated Ponseti technique: a comparative study
    Elgohary H.S.A.
    Abulsaad M.
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (5) : 949 - 953
  • [6] Flowers K R, 1994, J Hand Ther, V7, P150
  • [7] Improved bracing compliance in children with clubfeet using a dynamic orthosis
    Garg, Sumeet
    Porter, Kristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 3 (04) : 271 - 276
  • [8] Influence of cast change interval in the Ponseti method: A systematic review
    Giesberts, R. B.
    van der Steen, M. C.
    Maathuis, P. G. M.
    Besselaar, A. T.
    Hekman, E. E. G.
    Verkerke, G. J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [9] Gilani SF., 2014, J PAK ORTHOP ASS, V26, P7
  • [10] Ponseti Method Compared with Surgical Treatment of Clubfoot A Prospective Comparison
    Halanski, Matthew A.
    Davison, Jan E.
    Huang, Jen-Chen
    Walker, Cameron G.
    Walsh, Stewart J.
    Crawford, Haemish A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (02) : 270 - 278