Feral hogs control brackish marsh plant communities over time

被引:6
作者
Hensel, Marc J. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Silliman, Brian R. [2 ]
Hensel, Enie [3 ]
Byrnes, Jarrett E. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[3] Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Dept Biol Sci, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
关键词
competition; feral swine; Juncus romerianus; marsh grass; pigs; Schoenoplectus americanus; Spartina cynosuroides; Sus scrofa; SUS-SCROFA; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS; TIDAL FRESH; WILD; DISTURBANCE; CONSEQUENCES; ACCUMULATION; VEGETATION; ELEPHANTS;
D O I
10.1002/ecy.3572
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Feral hogs modify ecosystems by consuming native species and altering habitat structure. These invasions can generate fundamentally different post-invasion habitats when disturbance changes community structure, ecosystem function, or recovery dynamics. Here, we use multiple three-year exclusion experiments to describe how feral hogs affect hyper-productive brackish marshes over time. We find that infrequent yet consistent hog foraging and trampling suppresses dominant plants by generating a perpetually disturbed habitat that favors competitively inferior species and disallows full vegetative recovery over time. Along borders between plant monocultures, trampling destroys dominant graminoids responsible for most aboveground marsh biomass while competitively inferior plants increase fivefold. Hog activities shift the brackish marsh disturbance regime from pulse to press, which changes the plant community: competitively inferior plants increase coverage, species diversity is doubled, and live cover is lowered by 30% as large plants are unable to take hold in hog-disturbed areas. Release from disturbance does not result in complete recovery (i.e., dominant plant monocultures) because hog consumer control is a combination of both top-down control and broader engineering effects. These results highlight how habitats are susceptible to invasive effects outside of structural destruction alone, especially if large consumers are pervasive over time and change the dynamics that sustain recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Effects of rooting by feral hogs Sus scrofa L. on the structure of a floodplain vegetation assemblage [J].
Arrington, DA ;
Toth, LA ;
Koebel, JW .
WETLANDS, 1999, 19 (03) :535-544
[2]   Linking the pattern to the mechanism: How an introduced mammal facilitates plant invasions [J].
Barrios-Garcia, M. Noelia ;
Simberloff, Daniel .
AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 38 (08) :884-890
[3]   Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review [J].
Barrios-Garcia, M. Noelia ;
Ballari, Sebastian A. .
BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2012, 14 (11) :2283-2300
[4]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[5]   Consequences Associated with the Recent Range Expansion of Nonnative Feral Swine [J].
Bevins, Sarah N. ;
Pedersen, Kerri ;
Lutman, Mark W. ;
Gidlewski, Thomas ;
Deliberto, Thomas J. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (04) :291-299
[6]   PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN OLIGOHALINE TIDAL MARSH [J].
BREWER, JS ;
GRACE, JB .
VEGETATIO, 1990, 90 (02) :93-107
[7]   Invasions and Extinctions Reshape Coastal Marine Food Webs [J].
Byrnes, Jarrett E. ;
Reynolds, Pamela L. ;
Stachowicz, John J. .
PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (03)
[8]   Feral swine damage and damage management in forested ecosystems [J].
Campbell, Tyler A. ;
Long, David B. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 257 (12) :2319-2326
[9]   Elephants in the understory: opposing direct and indirect effects of consumption and ecosystem engineering by megaherbivores [J].
Coverdale, Tyler C. ;
Kartzinel, Tyler R. ;
Grabowski, Kathryn L. ;
Shriver, Robert K. ;
Hassan, Abdikadir A. ;
Goheen, Jacob R. ;
Palmer, Todd M. ;
Pringle, Robert M. .
ECOLOGY, 2016, 97 (11) :3219-3230