An assessment of the 3 February 2002 Cay (Turkey) earthquake (Mw=6.6): Modeling of ground motions and felt intensity distribution

被引:16
作者
Can, Gizem [1 ]
Askan, Aysegul [1 ,2 ]
Karimzadeh, Shaghayegh [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Earthquake Studies, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Univ Minho, Inst Sustainabil & Innovat Struct Engn, P-4800058 Braga, Portugal
关键词
the 3 February 2002 Cay earthquake; Turkey; Ground motion simulations; Damage distribution; Felt intensity; SPECTRAL ELEMENT METHOD; STOCHASTIC POINT-SOURCE; LAYERED HALF-SPACE; STRESS DROP; SIMULATION; CALIFORNIA; PARAMETERS; ANATOLIA; GRABEN; MODULI;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106832
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Estimation of earthquake ground motions is important for several purposes including seismic design, analysis, risk mitigation and disaster management. For regions with insufficient data, simulations become critical, particularly for earthquake engineering applications requiring full ground motion data. In this study, stochastic finite-fault simulation of the 3 February 2002 Cay event is presented at three available stations within epicentral distances less than 200 km. The simulations are initially validated at these stations. Next, simulations of the earthquake at dummy nodes are performed in Afyon region. The simulated ground motion records for the Cay event are evaluated by comparing them against selected ground motion prediction equations. Then, the distributions of the observed intensity and damage are compared against the distribution of simulated intensities. The results reveal that the earthquake is simulated effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations [J].
Abrahamson, Norman ;
Silva, Walter .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :67-97
[2]   SCALING LAW OF SEISMIC SPECTRUM [J].
AKI, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1967, 72 (04) :1217-&
[3]   Scaling earthquake ground motions in western Anatolia, Turkey [J].
Akinci, Aybige ;
D'Amico, Sebastiano ;
Malagnini, Luca ;
Mercuri, Alessia .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2013, 63 :124-135
[4]  
Akkar S, 2014, B EARTHQ ENG, V12, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4
[5]   Source parameters for the Mw=6.6, 03 February 2002, Cay Earthquake (Turkey) and aftershocks from GPS, Southwestern Turkey [J].
Aktug, Bahadir ;
Kaypak, Buelent ;
Celik, Rahmi Nurhan .
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2010, 14 (03) :445-456
[6]  
ANDERSON JG, 1984, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V74, P1969
[7]   Probabilistic methods for the estimation of potential seismic damage: Application to reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey [J].
Askan, A. ;
Yucemen, M. S. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (04) :262-271
[8]   A Guide to Differences between Stochastic Point-Source and Stochastic Finite-Fault Simulations [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. ;
Assatourians, Karen ;
Boore, David M. ;
Campbell, Ken ;
Motazedian, Dariush .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 99 (06) :3192-3201
[9]   Stochastic modeling of California ground motions [J].
Atkinson, GM ;
Silva, W .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 90 (02) :255-274
[10]  
ATKINSON GM, 1995, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V85, P17