Inferring the microscopic surface energy of protein-protein interfaces from mutation data

被引:8
作者
Moal, Iain H. [1 ]
Dapkunas, Justas [2 ]
Fernandez-Recio, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] BSC, Dept Life Sci, Joint BSC IRB Res Program Computat Biol, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Vilnius Univ, Inst Biotechnol, LT-02241 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
protein-protein interactions; binding affinity; interaction energy; mutation; docking; hydrophobic effect; empirical modeling; CHAIN CONFORMATIONAL ENTROPY; COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN; BINDING-AFFINITY; HYDROPHOBIC PATCHES; DRIVING-FORCE; DOCKING; PREDICTION; SPECIFICITY; COMPLEX; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1002/prot.24761
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mutations at protein-protein recognition sites alter binding strength by altering the chemical nature of the interacting surfaces. We present a simple surface energy model, parameterized with empirical G values, yielding mean energies of -48 calmol(-1)angstrom(-2) for interactions between hydrophobic surfaces, -51 to -80 calmol(-1)angstrom(-2) for surfaces of complementary charge, and 66-83 calmol(-1)angstrom(-2) for electrostatically repelling surfaces, relative to the aqueous phase. This places the mean energy of hydrophobic surface burial at -24 calmol(-1)angstrom(-2). Despite neglecting configurational entropy and intramolecular changes, the model correlates with empirical binding free energies of a functionally diverse set of rigid-body interactions (r=0.66). When used to rerank docking poses, it can place near-native solutions in the top 10 for 37% of the complexes evaluated, and 82% in the top 100. The method shows that hydrophobic burial is the driving force for protein association, accounting for 50-95% of the cohesive energy. The model is available open-source from and via the CCharpPPI web server . Proteins 2015; 83:640-650. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 650
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Peptide segments in protein-protein interfaces
    Pal, Arumay
    Chakrabarti, Pinak
    Bahadur, Ranjit
    Rodier, Francis
    Janin, Joel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2007, 32 (01) : 101 - 111
  • [32] Druggability of Dynamic Protein-protein Interfaces
    Ulucan, Ozlem
    Eyrisch, Susanne
    Helms, Volkhard
    [J]. CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2012, 18 (30) : 4599 - 4606
  • [33] Peptide segments in protein-protein interfaces
    Arumay Pal
    Pinak Chakrabarti
    Ranjit Bahadur
    Francis Rodier
    Joël Janin
    [J]. Journal of Biosciences, 2007, 32 : 101 - 111
  • [34] Intermolecular Contact Potentials for Protein-Protein Interactions Extracted from Binding Free Energy Changes upon Mutation
    Moal, Iain H.
    Fernandez-Recio, Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 9 (08) : 3715 - 3727
  • [35] Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking
    Alsop, James D.
    Mitchell, Julie C.
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 83 (11) : 1940 - 1946
  • [36] Predicting Protein-Protein Interfaces that Bind Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions
    Wong, Eric T. C.
    Gsponer, Jorg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2019, 431 (17) : 3157 - 3178
  • [37] A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces
    Tuncbag, Nurcan
    Kar, Gozde
    Keskin, Ozlem
    Gursoy, Attila
    Nussinov, Ruth
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10 (03) : 217 - 232
  • [38] Implication of Terminal Residues at Protein-Protein and Protein-DNA Interfaces
    Martin, Olivier M. F.
    Etheve, Loic
    Launay, Guillaume
    Martin, Juliette
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [39] Predicting affinity- and specificity-enhancing mutations at protein-protein interfaces
    Sharabi, Oz
    Shirian, Jason
    Shifman, Julia M.
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2013, 41 : 1166 - 1169
  • [40] Characterization of Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces from a Single Species
    Talavera, David
    Robertson, David L.
    Lovell, Simon C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06):