The role of covariate balance in observational studies

被引:17
作者
Sauppe, Jason J. [1 ]
Jacobson, Sheldon H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin La Crosse, Dept Comp Sci, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
observational data; causal inference; matching; balance; optimization; strong ignorability; MULTIVARIATE MATCHING METHODS; PROPENSITY-SCORE; CAUSAL INFERENCE; REGRESSION ADJUSTMENT; BIAS REDUCTION; FINE BALANCE; REMOVE BIAS; OPTIMIZATION; SUBSET; ESTIMATORS;
D O I
10.1002/nav.21751
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Observational data are prevalent in many fields of research, and it is desirable to use this data to make causal inferences. Because this data is nonrandom, additional assumptions are needed in order to construct unbiased estimators for causal effects. The standard assumption is strong ignorability, though it is often impossible to achieve the level of covariate balance that it requires. As such, researchers often settle for lesser balance levels within their datasets. However, these balance levels are generally insufficient to guarantee an unbiased estimate of the treatment effect without further assumptions. This article presents several extensions to the strong ignorability assumption that address this issue. Under these additional assumptions, specific levels of covariate balance are both necessary and sufficient for the treatment effect estimate to be unbiased. There is a trade-off, however: as balance decreases, stronger assumptions are required to guarantee estimator unbiasedness. These results unify parametric and nonparametric adjustment methods for causal inference and are actualized by the Balance Optimization Subset Selection framework, which identifies the best level of balance that can be achieved within a dataset. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 64: 323-344, 2017
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 344
页数:22
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects [J].
Abadie, A ;
Imbens, GW .
ECONOMETRICA, 2006, 74 (01) :235-267
[2]   Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2011, 29 (01) :1-11
[3]   COMPUTERIZED CONSTRUCTION OF A MATCHED SAMPLE [J].
ALTHAUSER, RP ;
RUBIN, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1970, 76 (02) :325-+
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, New Functions for Multivariate Analysis
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Statistical Science, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013232
[6]   The Power of Optimization Over Randomization in Designing Experiments Involving Small Samples [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Johnson, Mac ;
Kallus, Nathan .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 63 (04) :868-876
[7]   An optimization approach for making causal inferences [J].
Cho, Wendy K. Tam ;
Sauppe, Jason J. ;
Nikolaev, Alexander G. ;
Jacobson, Sheldon H. ;
Sewell, Edward C. .
STATISTICA NEERLANDICA, 2013, 67 (02) :211-226
[8]  
COCHRAN WG, 1973, SANKHYA SER A, V35, P417
[9]   Observational Methods in Comparative Effectiveness Research [J].
Concato, John ;
Lawler, Elizabeth V. ;
Lew, Robert A. ;
Gaziano, J. Michael ;
Aslan, Mihaela ;
Huang, Grant D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 123 (12) :E16-E23
[10]   Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd [J].
Dehejia, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 125 (1-2) :355-364