D'Amico Risk Stratification Correlates With Degree of Suspicion of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:88
|
作者
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. [1 ]
Baccala, Angelo A., Jr. [1 ]
Chung, Paul H. [1 ]
Proano, Juan M. [1 ]
Kruecker, Jochen [5 ]
Xu, Sheng [5 ]
Locklin, Julia K. [3 ]
Turkbey, Baris [2 ]
Shih, Joanna [1 ]
Bratslavsky, Gennady [1 ]
Linehan, W. Marston [1 ]
Glossop, Neil D. [4 ]
Yan, Pingkun [5 ]
Kadoury, Samuel [5 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [2 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [3 ,4 ]
Pinto, Peter A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NIH, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Philips Healthcare, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Philips Res N Amer, Briarcliff Manor, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GLEASON SCORE; BIOPSY; MRI; RADIATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.076
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined whether there is a correlation between D'Amico risk stratification and the degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based on targeted biopsies done with our electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion platform. Materials and Methods: A total of 101 patients underwent 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate, consisting of T2, dynamic contrast enhanced, diffusion weighted and spectroscopy images in cases suspicious for or with a diagnosis of prostate cancer. All prostate magnetic resonance imaging lesions were then identified and graded by the number of positive modalities, including low-2 or fewer, moderate-3 and high-4 showing suspicion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. The biopsy protocol included standard 12-core biopsy, followed by real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies of the suspicious magnetic resonance lesions. Cases and lesions were stratified by the D'Amico risk stratification. Results: In this screening population 90.1% of men had a negative digital rectal examination. Mean +/- SD age was 62.7 +/- 8.3 years and median prostate specific antigen was 5.8 ng/ml. Of the cases 54.5% were positive for cancer on protocol biopsy. Chi-square analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between magnetic resonance suspicion and D'Amico risk stratification (p <0.0001). Within cluster resampling demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between magnetic resonance suspicion and D'Amico risk stratification for magnetic resonance targeted core biopsies and magnetic resonance lesions (p <0.01) Conclusions: Our data support the notion that using multiparametric magnetic resonance prostate imaging one may assess the degree of risk associated with magnetic resonance visible lesions in the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 820
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usefulness of Pre-biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Variables to Reduce Initial Prostate Biopsy in Men with Suspected Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Numao, Noboru
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Komai, Yoshinobu
    Ishii, Chikako
    Kagawa, Makoto
    Kijima, Toshiki
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Koga, Fumitaka
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Kihara, Kazunori
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) : 502 - 508
  • [22] Periprostatic Adiposity Measured on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates with Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
    Zhang Qiang
    Sun Li-jiang
    Qi Jun
    Yang Zhi-gang
    Huang Tao
    Huo Ri-cha
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 11 (04) : 1793 - 1799
  • [23] Prediction of extracapsular disease with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in high risk localized prostate cancer patients
    Hernandez-Sanchez, J. E.
    Castillo, E.
    Barbero, J. M.
    Lista, F.
    Gonzalez, Y. J.
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (10): : 956 - 966
  • [24] Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
    Morote, Juan
    Celma, Anna
    Roche, Sarai
    de Torres, Ines M.
    Mast, Richard
    Semedey, Maria E.
    Regis, Lucas
    Planas, Jacques
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (06): : 664 - 669
  • [25] Prostate cancer risk stratification with magnetic resonance imaging
    Felker, Ely R.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Nassiri, Nima
    Marks, Leonard S.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 311 - 319
  • [26] Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer
    Dianat, Seyed Saeid
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (01) : 39.e1 - 39.e10
  • [27] Conventional imaging and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (MRI, MRS, DWI, MRP) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Panebianco, V.
    Sciarra, A.
    Marcantonio, A.
    Forte, V.
    Biondi, T.
    Laghi, A.
    Catalano, C.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 56 (04) : 331 - 342
  • [28] What kind of prostate cancers do we miss on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?
    De Visschere, Pieter Julien Luc
    Naesens, Leslie
    Libbrecht, Louis
    Van Praet, Charles
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Pattyn, Eva
    Villeirs, Geert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) : 1098 - 1107
  • [29] Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Pathologic Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
    Harland, Niklas
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Todenhoefer, Tilman
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2021, 39 (01) : 38 - 47
  • [30] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate - a basic tutorial
    Cabarrus, Miguel C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 376 - 386