Multiple Linear Regression in Predicting Motor Assessment Scale of Stroke Patients

被引:2
作者
Mazlan, Sulaiman [1 ]
Rahman, Hisyam Abdul [1 ]
Ibrahim, Babul Salam Ksm Kader [2 ]
Fai, Yeong Che [3 ]
Alhusni, Nurul Aisyah Mohd Rostam [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Adv Mechatron Res Grp ADMIRE, Batu Pahat 86400, Malaysia
[2] Coventry Univ, Fac Engn Environm & Comp, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Ctr Artificial Intelligence & Robot, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
[4] SOCSO Tun Razak Rehabil Ctr, Occupat Therapy Dept, Melaka 75450, Malaysia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
Multiple linear regression; robotic; rehabilitation; upper limb; stroke; UPPER-LIMB REHABILITATION; ROBOT-ASSISTED THERAPY; MODELS;
D O I
10.30880/ijie.2021.13.06.029
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) is a predictive model that was commonly used to predict the clinical score of stroke patients. However, the performance of the predictive model slightly depends on the method of feature selection on the data as input predictor to the model. Therefore, appropriate feature selection method needs to be investigated in order to give an optimum performance of the prediction. This paper aims (i) to develop predictive model for Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) prediction of stroke patients, (ii) to establish relationship between kinematic variables and MAS score using a predictive model, (iii) to evaluate the prediction performance of a predictive model based on root mean squared error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination R-2. Three types of feature selection methods involve in this study which are the combination of all kinematic variables, the combination of the best four or less kinematic variables, and the combination of kinematic variables based on p < 0.05. The prediction performance of MLR model between two assessment devices (iRest and ReHAD) has been compared. As the result, MLR model for ReHAD with the combination of kinematic variables that has p < 0.05 as input predictor has the best performance with Draw I (RMSEte = 1.9228, R-2 = 0.8623), Draw Diamond (RMSEte = 2.6136, R-2 = 0.7477), and Draw Circle (RMSEte = 2.1756, R-2 = 0.8268). These finding suggest that the relationship between kinematic variables and MAS score of stoke patients is strong, and the MLR model with feature selection of kinematic variables that has p < 0.05 is able to predict the MAS score of stroke patients using the kinematic variables extracted from the assessment device.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Ang BWK, 2019, 2019 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT ROBOTICS (ROBOSOFT 2019), P577, DOI [10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722771, 10.1109/robosoft.2019.8722771]
  • [2] Avellar N.B.C. de, 2020, 1 INT EL C ACT TECHN, V64, P10, DOI [10.3390/IeCAT2020-08519, DOI 10.3390/IECAT2020-08519]
  • [3] Comparison of linear and nonlinear calibration models based on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data for gasoline properties prediction
    Balabin, Roman M.
    Safieva, Ravilya Z.
    Lomakina, Ekaterma I.
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2007, 88 (02) : 183 - 188
  • [4] Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device - A randomized clinical trial
    Barker, Ruth N.
    Brauer, Sandra G.
    Carson, Richard G.
    [J]. STROKE, 2008, 39 (06) : 1800 - 1807
  • [5] Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Bertani, Rachele
    Melegari, Corrado
    De Cola, Maria C.
    Bramanti, Alessia
    Bramanti, Placido
    Calabro, Rocco Salvatore
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 38 (09) : 1561 - 1569
  • [6] Considerations and Practical Options for Measuring Muscle Strength: A Narrative Review
    Bohannon, Richard W.
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [7] Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke
    Bosecker, Caitlyn
    Dipietro, Laura
    Volpe, Bruce
    Krebs, Hermano Igo
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2010, 24 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [8] Robot-Assisted Arm Training versus Therapist-Mediated Training after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zejian
    Wang, Chun
    Fan, Wei
    Gu, Minghui
    Yasin, Gvzalnur
    Xiao, Shaohua
    Huang, Jie
    Huang, Xiaolin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [9] Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients
    Ciesla, Nancy
    Dinglas, Victor
    Fan, Eddy
    Kho, Michelle
    Kuramoto, Jill
    Needham, Dale
    [J]. JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2011, (50):
  • [10] Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study
    Colombo, Roberto
    Pisano, Fabrizio
    Delconte, Carmen
    Mazzone, Alessandra
    Grioni, Giuseppe
    Castagna, Marisa
    Bazzini, Giacomo
    Imarisio, Chiara
    Maggioni, Giorgio
    Pistarini, Caterina
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (02) : 240 - 248