Carbon intensity of in-situ oil sands operations with direct contact steam generation lower than that of once-through steam generation

被引:6
作者
Ashoori, Samaneh [1 ]
Gates, Ian D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Oil sands; Steam -assisted gravity drainage; Steam generation; Direct contact steam generation; Emissions reduction; Life cycle assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; HEAVY OIL; EXTRACTION; SAGD; INJECTION; RECOVERY; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The oil sands resource in Western Canada are a considerable energy asset for Canada, but the energy and emissions intensities of producing this petroleum resource are substantially worse than that of conventional petroleum resources. With requirements for carbon-intensity reduction, new, less emissive recovery processes must be developed to enable continued production and cash flow from this important resource. The largest source of carbon emissions on in-situ in oil sands recovery processes, such as Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), is steam generation, where natural gas is combusted. An alternative to conventional steam generation is Direct Contact Steam Generation (DCSG), where steam is generated in the combustion flame, and with rich oxygen combustion, the steam plus carbon dioxide mixture is injected into the reservoir. We explore the carbon intensity of DCSG and compare it to existing once-through steam generation using life cycle analysis. The results reveal considerable environmental benefits with nearly 30% emission reduction when applying a DCSG in SAGD instead of an OTSG. The results suggest that oil sands operators could improve their emissions intensity significantly if they adopted DCSGs in their operations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Integration of Impacts on Water, Air, Land, and Cost towards Sustainable Petroleum Oil Production in Alberta, Canada [J].
Ali, Babkir .
RESOURCES-BASEL, 2020, 9 (06)
[2]  
Allen M., 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C an IPCC Special Report
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Paper SPE-129518-STU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, World Energy Outlook 2023
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Emissions Gap Report 2019
[6]   Impact of carbon capture technologies on GHG emissions from oil sands in-situ facilities: A system prospective [J].
Ashrafi, Omid ;
Zamor, Orsen ;
Navarri, Philippe .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 188
[7]   Cleaner production from Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage using seismic-based automated control [J].
Austin-Adigio, Maureen ;
Gates, Ian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 209 :1139-1151
[8]   LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS - A CRITIQUE [J].
AYRES, RU .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1995, 14 (3-4) :199-223
[9]   Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Current Oil Sands Technologies: Surface Mining and In Situ Applications [J].
Bergerson, Joule A. ;
Kofoworola, Oyeshola ;
Charpentier, Alex D. ;
Sleep, Sylvia ;
MacLean, Heather L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (14) :7865-7874
[10]  
Betzer-Zilevitch M., 2010, CAN UNC RES INT PETR