Mini-Open or Percutaneous Bilateral Lumbar Transfacet Pedicle Screw Fixation A Technical Note

被引:8
作者
Chin, Kingsley R. [1 ]
Seale, Jason [1 ]
Cumming, Vanessa [2 ]
机构
[1] iMIS, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[2] Soc Facet Surg Tech & Technol Inc, LES Soc, Wilton Manors, FL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
stepwise technique description; bilateral lumbar transfacet pedicle screws; lumbar fusion using bilateral transfacet pedicle screws; POSTERIOR FIXATION; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827fe17e
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Case report. Objective: To describe the technique used to place bilateral lumbar transfacet pedicle screws. Summary of Background Data: Transfacet pedicle screw fixation is a growing alternative and biomechanically comparable with traditional pedicle screw fixation. There is no clear description of technique steps for placing transfacet pedicle screws available in the literature, despite recognizing that screw placement is not intuitive even with fluoroscopy, and is dissimilar to placing traditional pedicle screws or translaminar facet screws. Methods: We present 2 illustrative cases where bilateral transfacet pedicle screws were placed for posterior instrumentation after a step-by-step technique that can be used in a mini-open or percutaenous procedure. Results: Postoperatively, both patients had adequately placed transfacet pedicle screws bilaterally on x-ray imaging with 1 patient demonstrating fusion and intact fixation at 11 months follow-up. Conclusions: Transfacet pedicle screws were successfully placed in 2 patients in a stepwise technique described to achieve lumbar fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
AAOS, 1996, AAOS ARCH B
[2]   Efficacy of translaminar facet screw fixation in circumferential interbody fusions as compared to pedicle screw fixation [J].
Best, Natalie M. ;
Sasso, Rick C. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (02) :98-103
[3]  
BOUCHER HH, 1959, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V41, P248
[4]   Biomechanical analysis of posterior fixation techniques in a 360° arthrodesis model [J].
Burton, D ;
McIff, T ;
Fox, T ;
Lark, R ;
Asher, MA ;
Glattes, RC .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (24) :2765-2771
[5]   Clinical outcome after spinal fusion with a rigid versus a semi-rigid pedicle screw system [J].
Dahl B. ;
Gehrchen P. ;
Blyme P. ;
Kiær T. ;
Tøndevold E. .
European Spine Journal, 1997, 6 (6) :412-416
[6]   A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation - Effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling [J].
Ferrara, LA ;
Secor, JL ;
Jin, BH ;
Wakefield, A ;
Inceoglu, S ;
Benzel, EC .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (12) :1226-1234
[7]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - The effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine [J].
Harris, BM ;
Hilibrand, AS ;
Savas, PE ;
Pellegrino, A ;
Vaccaro, AR ;
Siegler, S ;
Albert, TJ .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (04) :E65-E70
[8]   INTERNAL FIXATION FOR LUMBOSACRAL FUSION [J].
KING, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1948, 30-A (03) :560-&
[9]   Biomechanical comparison of a novel percutaneous transfacet device and a traditional posterior system for single level fusion [J].
Mahar, Andrew ;
Kim, Choll ;
Oka, Richard ;
Odell, Tim ;
Perry, Andrew ;
Mirkovic, Srdjan ;
Garfin, Steve .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (08) :591-594
[10]   Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review [J].
Oxland, TR ;
Lund, T .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (Suppl 1) :S95-S101