Avoiding misclassification of thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): What are the best-performing SLE classification criteria?

被引:6
作者
Signorelli, Flavio [1 ,2 ]
Balbi, Gustavo Guimaraes Moreira [1 ,3 ]
Bonfa, Eloisa [1 ]
Borba, Eduardo F. [1 ]
Andrade, Danieli Castro de Oliveira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Rheumatol Div, Av Dr Arnaldo 455,Third Floor,LIM 17, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Hosp Univ Pedro Ernesto, Rheumatol Div, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Juiz De Fora, Univ Hosp, Rheumatol Div, Juiz De Fora, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Systemic lupus erythematosus; primary antiphospholipid syndrome; ACR; EULAR 2019 criteria and SLICC 2012 criteria; ANTIBODIES; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1177/09612033211033978
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (PAPS) overlap clinical and immunological features. Therefore, misclassification of PAPS patients as SLE is a concern. The ACR/EULAR 2019 SLE classification has never been studied in PAPS. Objective To verify if the ACR/EULAR 2019 SLE classification can correctly classify a PAPS patient as not having SLE and compare its performance with the SLICC 2012 SLE classification. Methods: One-hundred thrombotic PAPS patients who fulfilled the Sidney criteria were consecutively screened and those who attended the inclusion criteria were submitted to ACR/EULAR 2019 and SLICC 2012 classifications. Results Sixty-seven PAPS patients were included in this study. The majority was female (89.6%) with median age at study inclusion of 45 years (35-53) and median PAPS disease duration of 13 years (8-19). PAPS correct classification was observed more often with ACR/EULAR 2019 than SLICC 2021 criteria (94.0% vs. 64.2%; p < 0.001). The 4 misclassified patients in ACR/EULAR 2019 were also misclassified in SLICC 2012. The comparison of misclassified patients to those correctly not classified as SLE resulted, for both criteria, in higher frequencies of hematological domain [ACR/EULAR 2019 (100% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.010) and SLICC 2012 (95.8% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001)]. Further analysis of hematological manifestations revealed that for the ACR/EULAR 2019 leukopenia (100% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004) and for the SLICC 2012 leukopenia/lymphopenia (91.7% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in misclassified group. Proteinuria (20.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and low complement (45.8% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.033) were also more often observed in the incorrectly SLICC 2012 classified patients. Conclusion ACR/EULAR 2019 had high accuracy for distinguishing PAPS from SLE, whereas the SLICC 2012 incorrectly classified more than one third of the PAPS patients as having SLE.
引用
收藏
页码:1732 / 1738
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment [J].
Adamichou, Christina ;
Nikolopoulos, Dionysis ;
Genitsaridi, Irini ;
Bortoluzzi, Alessandra ;
Fanouriakis, Antonis ;
Papastefanakis, Emmanouil ;
Kalogiannaki, Eleni ;
Gergianaki, Irini ;
Sidiropoulos, Prodromos ;
Boumpas, Dimitrios T. ;
Bertsias, George K. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 (02) :232-241
[2]   Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus [J].
Arbuckle, MR ;
McClain, MT ;
Rubertone, MV ;
Scofield, RH ;
Dennis, GJ ;
James, JA ;
Harley, JB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (16) :1526-1533
[3]  
Aringer M, 2019, ARTHRITIS RHEUMATOL, V71, P1400, DOI [10.1002/art.40930, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819]
[4]   New 2019 SLE EULAR/ACR classification criteria are valuable for distinguishing patients with SLE from patients with pSS [J].
Assan, Florence ;
Seror, Raphaele ;
Mariette, Xavier ;
Nocturne, Gaetane .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 80 (08)
[5]   Comparison of Three Classification Criteria Sets for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Study Looking at Links to Outcome and Mortality [J].
Carneiro, Antonio Costa ;
Ruiz, Marta Mozo ;
Freitas, Sara ;
Isenberg, David .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2020, 72 (11) :1611-1614
[6]   Lessons from the "Euro-Phospholipid" project [J].
Cervera, Ricard .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2008, 7 (03) :174-178
[7]   Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation [J].
Devreese, Katrien M. J. ;
de Groot, Philip G. ;
de Laat, Bas ;
Erkan, Doruk ;
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. ;
Mackie, Ian ;
Martinuzzo, Marta ;
Ortel, Thomas L. ;
Pengo, Vittorio ;
Rand, Jacob H. ;
Tripodi, Armando ;
Wahl, Denis ;
Cohen, Hannah .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2020, 18 (11) :2828-2839
[8]  
EHRENSTEIN MR, 1993, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V32, P362
[9]   Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis [J].
Ginzler, EM ;
Dooley, MA ;
Aranow, C ;
Kim, MY ;
Buyon, J ;
Merrill, JT ;
Petri, M ;
Gilkeson, GS ;
Wallace, DJ ;
Weisman, MH ;
Appel, GB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (21) :2219-2228
[10]   Long-term follow-up in 128 patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome -: Do they develop lupus? [J].
Gómez-Puerta, JA ;
Martín, H ;
Amigo, MC ;
Aguirre, MA ;
Camps, MT ;
Cuadrado, MJ ;
Hughes, GRV ;
Khamashta, MA .
MEDICINE, 2005, 84 (04) :225-230