Estimating the impacts of financing support policies towards photovoltaic market in Indonesia: A social-energy-economy-environment model simulation

被引:35
作者
Al Irsyad, Muhammad Indra [1 ,2 ]
Halog, Anthony [2 ]
Nepal, Rabindra [3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Energy & Mineral Resources, Res & Dev Ctr Elect Renewable Energy & Energy Con, Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
Developing country; Socioeconomic; Agent-based modelling; Input-output analysis; Solar energy policy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RURAL ELECTRIFICATION; SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGIES; ADOPTION; PAYBACK; SCIENCE; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.069
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study develops a hybrid energy agent-based model that integrates the input-output analysis, environmental factors and socioeconomic characteristics of rural and urban households in Indonesia. We use the model to estimate the effects of four solar energy policy interventions on photovoltaic (PV) investments, government expenditure, economic outputs, CO2e emissions and the uses of steel, aluminium, concrete and energy. The results of our analysis call for the abolition of the PV donor gift policy, the improvement of production efficiency in the PV industry and the establishment of after-sales services and rural financing institutions. A 100 W peak (Wp) PV under this recommendation would be affordable for 80.6% of rural households that are projected to be without access to electricity in 2029. Net metering is the most effective policy for encouraging urban people to invest in PV in a situation where fossil energy prices are increasing and PV prices are declining. A donor gift policy may induce USD 51.9 new economic outputs for every Wp of PV operating to capacity in 2029, but would require a subsidy of USD 18.6/Wp. The recommended policies do not require subsidies and reduce CO2eq emissions and the consumption of aluminium, energy, steel and concrete by between 83.1% and 89.7% more than the existing policy. Several policy implications are discussed in response to these findings. As a contribution to energy modelling literature, the model can be used for other developing countries by merely changing its data.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 473
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]  
Nurse LA, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1613
[42]   Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems [J].
Peng, Jinqing ;
Lu, Lin ;
Yang, Hongxing .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 19 :255-274
[43]   Rural electrification and energy poverty: Empirical evidences from Brazil [J].
Pereira, Marcio Giannini ;
Vasconcelos Freitas, Marcos Aurelio ;
da Silva, Neilton Fidelis .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (04) :1229-1240
[44]  
PLN, 2017, PLNS STAT 2016
[45]   Agent-based modeling of energy technology adoption: Empirical integration of social, behavioral, economic, and environmental factors [J].
Rai, Varun ;
Robinson, Scott A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 70 :163-177
[46]   Examining interconnection and net metering policy for distributed generation in the United States [J].
Schelly, Chelsea ;
Louie, Edward P. ;
Pearce, Joshua M. .
Renewable Energy Focus, 2017, 22-23 :10-19
[47]   Managing the resilience space of the German energy system - A vector analysis [J].
Schloer, Holger ;
Venghaus, Sandra ;
Maerker, Carolin ;
Hake, Juergen-Friedrich .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 218 :527-539
[48]   A review on planning, configurations, modeling and optimization techniques of hybrid renewable energy systems for off grid applications [J].
Siddaiah, Rajanna ;
Saini, R. P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 58 :376-396
[49]   Assessing employment in renewable energy technologies: A case study for wind power in Brazil [J].
Simas, Moana ;
Pacca, Sergio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 :83-90
[50]   Integrating social science in energy research [J].
Sovacool, B. K. ;
Ryan, S. E. ;
Stern, P. C. ;
Janda, K. ;
Rochlin, G. ;
Spreng, D. ;
Pasqualetti, M. J. ;
Wilhite, H. ;
Lutzenhiser, L. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 6 :95-99