Paired Associative Stimulation with High-Frequency Peripheral Component Leads to Enhancement of Corticospinal Transmission at Wide Range of Interstimulus Intervals

被引:30
作者
Shulga, Anastasia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zubareva, Aleksandra [1 ,2 ]
Lioumis, Pantelis [1 ,2 ]
Makela, Jyrki P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, HUS Med Imaging Ctr, BioMag Lab, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Neurol, Clin Neurosci, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
paired associative stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; plasticity; spinal cord; peripheral electrical stimulation; MOTOR CORTEX; SPINAL-CORD; PLASTICITY; INDUCTION; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00470
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: In spinal paired associative stimulation (PAS), orthodromic and antidromic volleys elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) coincide at corticomotoneuronal synapses at the spinal cord. The interstimulus interval (ISI) between TMS and PNS determines whether PAS leads to motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation or depression. PAS applied as a long-term treatment for neurological patients might alter conduction of neural fibers over time. Moreover, measurements of motoneuron conductance for determination of ISIs may be challenging in these patients. Results: We sought to design a PAS protocol to induce MEP potentiation at wide range of ISIs. We tested PAS consisting of high-intensity (100% stimulator output, SO) TMS and high-frequency (50 Hz) PNS in five subjects at five different ISIs. Our protocol induced potentiation of MEP amplitudes in all subjects at all tested intervals. TMS and PNS alone did not result in MEP potentiation. The variant of PAS protocol described here does not require exact adjustment of ISIs in order to achieve effective potentiation of MEPs. Conclusions: This variant of PAS might be feasible as a long-term treatment in rehabilitation of neurological patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury Enhanced by Strengthening Corticospinal Synaptic Transmission [J].
Bunday, Karen L. ;
Perez, Monica A. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (24) :2355-2361
[2]   Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation [J].
Carson, Richard G. ;
Kennedy, Niamh C. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[3]   Spinal associative stimulation: A non-invasive stimulation paradigm to modulate spinal excitability [J].
Cortes, Mar ;
Thickbroom, Gary W. ;
Valls-Sole, Josep ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Edwards, Dylan J. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (11) :2254-2259
[4]   State of the art: Physiology of transcranial motor cortex stimulation [J].
Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo ;
Ziemann, Ulf ;
Lemon, Roger N. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (04) :345-362
[5]   The Spike-Timing Dependence of Plasticity [J].
Feldman, Daniel E. .
NEURON, 2012, 75 (04) :556-571
[6]  
GAJRAJ NM, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V78, P574
[7]   Pathway-specific plasticity in the human spinal cord [J].
Leukel, Christian ;
Taube, Wolfgang ;
Beck, Sandra ;
Schubert, Martin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 35 (10) :1622-1629
[8]   Long-term paired associative stimulation can restore voluntary control over paralyzed muscles in incomplete chronic spinal cord injury patients [J].
Anastasia Shulga ;
Pantelis Lioumis ;
Aleksandra Zubareva ;
Nina Brandstack ;
Linda Kuusela ;
Erika Kirveskari ;
Sarianna Savolainen ;
Aarne Ylinen ;
Jyrki P Mäkelä .
Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 2 (1)
[9]   The use of F-response in defining interstimulus intervals appropriate for LTP-like plasticity induction in lower limb spinal paired associative stimulation [J].
Shulga, Anastasia ;
Lioumis, Pantelis ;
Kirveskari, Erika ;
Savolainen, Sarianna ;
Makela, Jyrki P. ;
Ylinen, Aarne .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2015, 242 :112-117
[10]  
Sjöström PJ, 2001, NEURON, V32, P1149, DOI 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00542-6