Local impedance measurements during contact force-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for predicting an effective radiofrequency ablation

被引:2
|
作者
Sasaki, Takehito [1 ]
Nakamura, Kohki [1 ]
Minami, Kentaro [1 ]
Take, Yutaka [1 ]
Nakatani, Yosuke [1 ]
Miki, Yuko [1 ]
Goto, Koji [1 ]
Kaseno, Kenichi [1 ]
Yamashita, Eiji [1 ]
Koyama, Keiko [2 ]
Naito, Shigeto [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Prefectural Cardiovasc Ctr, Div Cardiol, 3-12 Kameizumi Machi, Maebashi, Gumma 3710004, Japan
[2] Gunma Prefectural Cardiovasc Ctr, Div Radiol, Maebashi, Gumma, Japan
关键词
atrial flutter; cavotricuspid isthmus; contact force; local impedance; radiofrequency catheter ablation; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/joa3.12680
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: An ablation catheter capable of contact force (CF) and local impedance (LI) monitoring (IntellaNav StablePoint, Boston Scientific) has been recently launched. We evaluated the relationship between the CF and LI values during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) along the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI). Methods: Fifty consecutive subjects who underwent a CTI-RFCA using IntellaNav StablePoint catheters were retrospectively studied. The initial CF and LI at the start of the RF applications and mean CF and minimum LI during the RF applications were measured. The absolute and percentage LI drops were calculated as the difference between the initial and minimum LIs and 100 x absolute LI drop/initial LI, respectively. Results: We analyzed 602 first-pass RF applications. A weak correlation was observed between the initial CF and LI (r = 0.13) and between the mean CF and LI drops (r = 0.22). The initial LI and absolute and percentage LI drops were greater at effective ablation sites than ineffective ablation sites (median, 151 vs. 138 omega, 22 vs. 14 omega, and 14.4% vs. 9.9%; p < .001), but the initial and mean CF did not differ. At optimal cutoffs of 21 omega and 10.8% for the absolute and percentage LI drops according to the receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the sensitivity, and specificity for predicting an effective ablation were 57.4% and 88.9% and 80.0%, and 61.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The effective sites during the CF-guided CTI-RFCA had greater initial LI and LI drops than the ineffective sites. Absolute and percentage LI drops of 21 omega and 10.8% may be appropriate targets for an effective ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 252
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal local impedance drops for an effective radiofrequency ablation during cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation
    Sasaki, Takehito
    Nakamura, Kohki
    Inoue, Mitsuho
    Minami, Kentaro
    Miki, Yuko
    Goto, Koji
    Take, Yutaka
    Kaseno, Kenichi
    Yamashita, Eiji
    Koyama, Keiko
    Naito, Shigeto
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2020, 36 (05) : 905 - 911
  • [2] Local impedance and contact force guidance to predict successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with a zero-fluoroscopy approach
    Melero-Polo, Jorge
    Cabrera-Ramos, Mercedes
    Alfonso-Almazan, Jose Manuel
    Marin-Garcia, Isabel
    Montilla-Padilla, Isabel
    Ruiz-Arroyo, Jose Ramon
    Lopez-Rodriguez, Guillermo
    Ramos-Maqueda, Javier
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 10
  • [3] Higher contact force, energy setting, and impedance rise during radiofrequency ablation predicts charring: New insights from contact force-guided in vivo ablation
    Makimoto, Hisaki
    Metzner, Andreas
    Tilz, Roland Richard
    Lin, Tina
    Heeger, Christian-H
    Rillig, Andreas
    Mathew, Shibu
    Lemes, Christine
    Wissner, Erik
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Ouyang, Feifan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 227 - 235
  • [4] Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter guided by contact force related parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pang, Naidong
    Gao, Jia
    Zhang, Nan
    Guo, Min
    Wang, Rui
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 9
  • [5] Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by force-time integral - A randomized study
    Asvestas, Dimitrios
    Sousonis, Vasileios
    Kotsovolis, George
    Karanikas, Stavros
    Xintarakou, Anastasia
    Sakadakis, Eleftherios
    Rigopoulos, Angelos G.
    Kalogeropoulos, Andreas S.
    Vardas, Panos
    Tzeis, Stylianos
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (05) : 503 - 508
  • [6] Combined local impedance and contact force for radiofrequency ablation assessment
    Garrott, Kara
    Laughner, Jacob
    Gutbrod, Sarah
    Sugrue, Alan
    Shuros, Allan
    Sulkin, Matt
    Yasin, Omar
    Bush, Jamie
    Pottinger, Nathan
    Meyers, Jason
    Kapa, Suraj
    HEART RHYTHM, 2020, 17 (08) : 1371 - 1380
  • [7] Mapping-guided ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: A novel simplified approach to radiofrequency catheter ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter
    Maruyama, Mitsunori
    Kobayashi, Yoshinori
    Miyauchi, Yasushi
    Iwasaki, Yu-ki
    Morita, Norishige
    Miyamoto, Shinjiro
    Tadera, Takeshi
    Ino, Takeshi
    Atarashi, Hirotsugu
    Katoh, Takao
    Takano, Teruo
    HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (06) : 665 - 673
  • [8] Characteristics of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter Guided by Novel Parameters Using a Contact Force Catheter
    Gould, Paul A.
    Booth, Cameron
    Dauber, Kieran
    Ng, Kevin
    Claughton, Andrew
    Kaye, Gerald C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (12) : 1429 - 1436
  • [9] Incremental Pacing for the Diagnosis of Complete Cavotricuspid Isthmus Block During Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Flutter
    Bazan, Victor
    Marti-Almor, Julio
    Perez-Rodon, Jordi
    Bruguera, Jordi
    Gerstenfeld, Edward P.
    Callans, David J.
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [10] High Incidence of Low Catheter-Tissue Contact Force at the Cavotricuspid Isthmus During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter: Implications for Achieving Isthmus Block
    Kumar, Saurabh
    Morton, Joseph B.
    Lee, Geoffrey
    Halloran, Karen
    Kistler, Peter M.
    Kalman, Jonathan M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 826 - 831