The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in managing hypertension according to different treatment guidelines

被引:3
作者
Addison, C [1 ]
Varney, S [1 ]
Coats, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW3 6LY, England
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; white coat effect; treatment thresholds;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jhh.1001210
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in identifying and managing a group of patients referred to a tertiary centre for the assessment of their blood pressure and to illustrate the importance of introducing standardised ABPM treatment guidelines. Patients and methods: We examined 2000 sequential ABP recordings, 1557 Were first time referrals from General Practitioners, Consultants and other hospitals. All patients were referred with suspected hypertension, resistant hypertension, white coat hypertension and for investigations of secondary hypertension. Fully trained nurse specialists fitted the monitors in the hypertension clinic and recordings were performed for 24 h. The data was then analysed and stratified according to treatment guidelines and categorised according to different definitions. Results: The group of first time referrals (n = 1557) showed an even sex distribution of 789 men and 768 women, mean age 53 +/- 13.8 (12-88 years). Of this group 542 patients (35%) exhibited a white coat effect (WCE), 526 (34%) had a daytime ABP less than or equal to 139/89 mm Hg. Of these 81 (15%) had a high clinic blood pressure (ie, white coat hypertension (WCH)) according to our definition. Thirty-five of these patients were not on treatment but may have had it initiated on the basis of their clinic pressures. According to the British Hypertension Society (BHS) guidelines on clinic readings 772 (45%) of our patients would be classified as hypertensive or inadequately treated, 509 (33%) borderline and 326 (21%) as normal. Using daytime ABP levels according to O'Brien: 1031 (67%) would be defined as abnormal, 192 (12%) as borderline and 334 (21%) as normal. Conclusion: These results illustrates how patient management may differ markedly when treating in accordance either with the BHS guidelines for clinic readings or the suggested levels for ABP. More patients had abnormal blood pressure levels according to ABPM, even though it is superior in detecting WCE and WCH. Clear guidelines for ABPM treatment levels need to be established.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 538
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Chalmers J, 1999, J HYPERTENS, V17, P151
  • [2] CLARK S, 1991, J HUM HYPERTENS, V5, P77
  • [3] COATS AJS, 1990, J HYPERTENS S6, V8, P17
  • [4] *MAN COMM BEH HIGH, 1997, CLIN EXP PHARM PHYSL, V24, P188
  • [5] MANCIA G, 1994, J HYPERTENS, V12, pS35
  • [6] O'Brien, 1998, Blood Press Monit, V3, P131
  • [7] What is "hypertension"?
    O'Brien, E
    Staessen, JA
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9164) : 1541 - 1543
  • [8] AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING AND CIRCADIAN VARIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE - CLINICAL AND RESEARCH APPLICATIONS
    PURCELL, HJ
    GIBBS, JSR
    COATS, AJS
    FOX, KM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 36 (02) : 135 - 149
  • [9] Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society
    Ramsay, LE
    Williams, B
    Johnston, GD
    MacGregor, GA
    Poston, L
    Potter, JF
    Poulter, NR
    Russell, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1999, 13 (09) : 569 - 592
  • [10] Verdecchia, 1998, Blood Press Monit, V3, P147