Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction

被引:11
|
作者
Bamdad, Shahram [1 ]
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed [2 ,3 ]
Abdolahian, Milad [1 ]
Pinero, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Zahedan, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Optometry, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt Pharmacol & Anat, Alicante, Spain
关键词
Auto-refraction; Subjective manifest refraction; Wavefront refraction; Cycloplegic refraction; IMAGE QUALITY; OBJECTIVE REFRACTION; MANIFEST REFRACTION; HUMAN EYE; ABERRATIONS; REPEATABILITY; ACCURACY; ABERROMETRY; PRECISION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of dry, and cycloplegic autorefraction and wavefront-based refraction with subjective refraction. Method: 83 subjects aged 19-57 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Refractive status was determined using four methods including subjective refraction, wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive data were recorded as sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent (SE). Power vector components were used to compare the astigmatism obtained using the different methods of refraction. Results: The more negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using dry autorefraction, wavefront-based refraction and dry autorefraction, respectively. The less negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using cycloplegic autorefraction, subjective refraction and cycloplegic autorefraction, respectively. Considering the spherical component, there was a statistically significant hyperopic shift (0.12 +/- 0.29 D, p = 0.001) with cycloplegic autorefraction and a significant myopic shift (-0.17 +/- 0.32 D, p < 0.001) with dry autorefraction compared to subjective refraction, while the difference between wavefront-based and subjective refraction was not significant statistically (p =0.145). The calculated cylindrical component using subjective refraction showed statistically significant difference with dry auto-refraction (p < 0.001), cycloplegic auto-refraction (p = 0.041) and wavefront refraction (p < 0.001). The highest correlation with subjective refraction in sphere, cylinder and SE was observed for cycloplegic auto-refraction (r(s)=0.967), dry auto-refraction (r(s)=0.983) and cycloplegic auto-refraction (r(s)=0.982), respectively. Conclusions: As subjective refraction is gold standard in our study, sphere in cycloplegic autorefraction and astigmatism in dry auto-refraction showed better agreement and correlation. (C) 2020 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients
    Ruiss, Manuel
    Findl, Oliver
    Draschl, Petra
    Harrer-Seely, Annette
    Hirnschall, Nino
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (08) : 1056 - 1063
  • [2] Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children
    Rauscher, Franziska G.
    Lange, Heike
    Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam
    Tegetmeyer, Helmut
    Sterker, Ina
    Hinz, Andreas
    Wahl, Siegfried
    Wiedemann, Peter
    Ohlendorf, Arne
    Blendowske, Ralf
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2019, 96 (11) : 879 - 889
  • [3] Comparisons of wavefront refraction, autorefraction, and subjective manifest refraction
    Lin, Hong-Zin
    Chen, Chien-Chung
    Lee, Yuan-Chieh
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 25 (01): : 43 - 46
  • [4] The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    Parker, Katrina E.
    Cheng, Han
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (05) : 387 - 392
  • [5] The Pentacam® AXI, Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study
    Balparda, Kepa
    Acevedo-Urrego, Andrea
    Silva-Quintero, Laura
    Herrera-Chalarca, Tatiana
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (05) : 1533 - +
  • [6] Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes
    Al-Tuwairqi, Waleed S.
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Razzouk, Haya
    Alanazi, Mana A.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (02): : 116 - 122
  • [7] Comparison of Self-Test Refraction , Autorefraction, and Subjective Refraction
    Kos, Abraao Ferreira de Sousa Neto
    Moscovici, Bernardo Kaplan
    Vilar, Cesar
    Chaves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias
    Da Silva, Maira Gomes Barbosa
    Neuwald, Mauricio Agne
    De Medeiros, Andre Lins
    Lake, Jonathan Clive
    Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta
    Tzelikis, Patrick Frensel de Moraes
    Carricondo, Pedro Carlos
    Gouvea, Larissa
    Nose, Walton
    Hida, Wilson Takashi
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 19 : 1085 - 1092
  • [8] Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Serramito, Maria
    Batres-Valderas, Laura
    Gonzalez-Bergaz, Anahi
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (04):
  • [9] A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in an Academic Optometry Clinic
    Kemchoknatee, Parinee
    Sunlakaviset, Pornlada
    Khieokhoen, Nattawat
    Srisombut, Thansit
    Tangon, Duanghathai
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [10] Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in high astigmatism
    Kangari, Haleh
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Rahmani, Saeed
    Ahmadian, Elnaz
    Yekta, Abbasali
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 18 (03) : 504 - 509