Safe-Planner: A Single-Outcome Replanner for Computing Strong Cyclic Policies in Fully Observable Non-Deterministic Domains

被引:1
作者
Mokhtari, Vahid [1 ,2 ]
Sathya, Ajay Suresha [1 ,2 ]
Tsiogkas, Nikolaos [1 ,2 ]
Deere, Wilm [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Robot Automat & Mechatron RAM, Dept Mech Engn, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Flanders Make, Leuven, Belgium
来源
2021 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS (ICAR) | 2021年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ICAR53236.2021.9659475
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Replanners are efficient methods for solving non-deterministic planning problems. Despite showing good scalability, existing replanners often fail to solve problems involving a large number of misleading plans, i.e., plans that do not lead to strong solutions, however, due to their minimal lengths, are likely to be found at every replanning iteration. The poor performance of replanners in such problems is due to their all-outcome determinization. That is, when compiling from non-deterministic to classical, they include all compiled classical operators in a single deterministic domain which leads replanners to continually generate misleading plans. We introduce an offline replanner, called Safe-Planner (SP), that relies on a single-outcome determinization to compile a non-deterministic domain into a set of classical domains, and ordering heuristics for ranking the obtained classical domains. The proposed single-outcome determinization and the heuristics allow for alternating between different classical domains. We show experimentally that SP avoids generating misleading plans, but rather generates weak plans that directly lead to strong solutions. The experiments show that SP outperforms state-of-the-art non-deterministic solvers by solving a broader range of problems. We also validate the practical utility of SP in real-world non-deterministic robotic tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 981
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Aertbeliën E, 2014, IEEE INT C INT ROBOT, P1540, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2014.6942760
  • [2] Plan aggregation for strong cyclic planning in nondeterministic domains
    Alford, Ron
    Kuter, Ugur
    Nau, Dana
    Goldman, Robert P.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, 216 : 206 - 232
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, Automated planning - theory and practice
  • [4] Bent John., 2012, MASS STORAGE SYSTEMS, P1
  • [5] Bonet B, 2005, 16 INT C AUT PLAN SC
  • [6] Bryce D, 6 INT PLANN COMP IPC
  • [7] Weak, strong, and strong cyclic planning via symbolic model checking
    Cimatti, A
    Pistore, M
    Roveri, M
    Traverso, P
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 147 (1-2) : 35 - 84
  • [8] Daniele M, 2000, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V1809, P35
  • [9] Fu J., 2011, 22 INT JOINT C ART I, P1949
  • [10] Geffner T, 2018, P I C AUTOMAT PLAN S, P88