A Methodological Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Solid Biofuels Systems

被引:3
作者
Sacramento Rivero, Julio C. [1 ]
Mwampamba, Tuyeni H. [2 ]
Navarro-Pineda, Freddy S. [1 ]
Musule, Ricardo [3 ,4 ]
Garcia, Carlos A. [3 ]
Martinez-Bravo, Rene D. [2 ]
Morales-Garcia, Ana L. [2 ]
Equihua-Sanchez, Mintzirani [3 ]
Fuentes-Gutierrez, Alfredo F. [2 ]
Gallardo-Alvarez, Rosa M. [3 ]
Ruiz Camou, Cesar R. [3 ]
Grande-Acosta, Genice K. [5 ]
Manzini, Fabio [5 ]
Islas-Samperio, Jorge M. [4 ]
Camarillo, Rafael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Yucatan, Fac Ingn Quim, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Ecosistemas & Sustentabilidad, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Univ Veracruzana, Fac Ciencias Quim, Campus Coatzacoalcos, Coatzacoalcos, Mexico
[5] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Energias Renovables, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
Sustainability indicators; Sustainability assessment; Mexico; Charcoal; Sugarcane bagasse; Fuelwood; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; INDICATORS; BIOMASS; ENERGY; CRITERIA; DESIGN; POWER; EROI;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-021-10365-2
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a methodological framework for assessing the sustainability of solid biofuels in Mexico. The designed framework comprises 13 normalized indicators and two diagnostic studies, covering the economic, social, environmental, and institutional sustainability dimensions, and their intersections. Indicators are normalized using the concept of load capacity of a system, similarly to the planetary boundaries. Thus, the graphical representation of results facilitates their multidimensional analysis. The framework was applied to three case studies: traditional fuelwood in rural households, charcoal for restaurant grilling, and electricity cogeneration from sugarcane bagasse. This was part of an iterative process of testing and refining the framework and simultaneously demonstrating its application in the Mexican bioenergy context. This led to the conclusion that the resulting framework (a) provides a useful, quantitative, and comprehensive overview of both broad and specific sustainability aspects of the assessed system; (b) requires a balance of accessible but also scattered or sensitive data, similarly to most existing frameworks; (c) is highly flexible and applicable to both modern and traditional solid biofuels; and (d) is simple to communicate and interpret for a wide audience. Key directions for improvement of the framework are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1797 / 1819
页数:23
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A new framework for the sustainable development goals of Saudi Arabia
    AlArjani, Ali
    Modibbo, Umar Muhammad
    Ali, Irfan
    Sarkar, Biswajit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY SCIENCE, 2021, 33 (06)
  • [2] A review of methods contributing to the assessment of the environmental sustainability of industrial systems
    Angelakoglou, K.
    Gaidajis, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 : 725 - 747
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Key environmental indicators
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, Technical Report
  • [5] An evaluation of the UK's use of SFM standards to procure solid woody biomass for electricity generation using sustainable bioenergy criteria
    Barnett, Brad
    [J]. BIOFUELS-UK, 2016, 7 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [6] Becerril J., 2012, PROBL DESARRO, V43, P135
  • [7] Berrueta Soriano VM, 2007, ENERGY ASSESSMENT PE
  • [8] Promoting sustainable local development of rural communities and mitigating climate change: the case of Mexico's Patsari improved cookstove project
    Berrueta, Victor M.
    Serrano-Medrano, Montserrat
    Garcia-Bustamante, Carlos
    Astier, Marta
    Masera, Omar R.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2017, 140 (01) : 63 - 77
  • [9] Economic growth and biomass energy
    Bildirici, Melike E.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 50 : 19 - 24
  • [10] Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development?
    Bilgili, Faik
    Kocak, Emrah
    Bulut, Umit
    Kuskaya, Sevda
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 71 : 830 - 845