Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study

被引:6
作者
Naab, Francis Z. Z. [1 ]
Coles, David [1 ,2 ]
Goddard, Ellen [3 ]
Frewer, Lynn J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
[2] The Bacchus, Enhance Int, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE19 1AA, England
[3] Univ Alberta, Fac Agr Life & Environm Sci, Agr Mkt & Business, 515 Gen Serv Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
来源
BIOTECH | 2021年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
breeding; ethics; farm animals; focus groups; genomics; public attitudes; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; ATTITUDES; RISK; FOOD; CITIZENS; WELFARE;
D O I
10.3390/biotech10040028
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The societal acceptability of different applications of genomic technologies to animal production systems will determine whether their innovation trajectories will reach the commercialisation stage. Importantly, technological implementation and commercialisation trajectories, regulation, and policy development need to take account of public priorities and attitudes. More effective co-production practices will ensure the application of genomic technologies to animals aligns with public priorities and are acceptable to society. Consumer rejection of, and limited demand for, animal products developed using novel genomic technologies will determine whether they are integration into the food system. However, little is known about whether genomic technologies that accelerate breeding but do not introduce cross-species genetic changes are more acceptable to consumers than those that do. Five focus groups, held in the north east of England, were used to explore the perceptions of, and attitudes towards, the use of genomic technologies in breeding farm animals for the human food supply chain. Overall, study participants were more positive towards genomic technologies applied to promote animal welfare (e.g., improved disease resistance), environmental sustainability, and human health. Animal "disenhancement" was viewed negatively and increased food production alone was not perceived as a potential benefit. In comparison to gene editing, research participants were most negative about genetic modification and the application of gene drives, independent of the benefits delivered.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, European Court of Justice: Case25/17Jehovantodistajat,ECLI:EU:C:2018:551
[2]  
Basinskiene L., 2021, Chemical Engineering Transactions, V87, P433
[3]   The elephant in the room: How a technology's name affects its interpretation [J].
Boersma, Reginald ;
Poortvliet, P. Marijn ;
Gremmen, Bart .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (02) :218-233
[4]   The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption [J].
Boland, Mike J. ;
Rae, Allan N. ;
Vereijken, Johan M. ;
Meuwissen, Miranda P. M. ;
Fischer, Arnout R. H. ;
van Boekel, Martinus A. J. S. ;
Rutherfurd, Shane M. ;
Gruppen, Harry ;
Moughan, Paul J. ;
Hendriks, Wouter H. .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 29 (01) :62-73
[5]   Genome edited animals: Learning from GM crops? [J].
Bruce, Ann .
TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) :385-398
[6]   Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function [J].
Burkard, Christine ;
Lillico, Simon G. ;
Reid, Elizabeth ;
Jackson, Ben ;
Mileham, Alan J. ;
Ait-Ali, Tahar ;
Whitelaw, C. Bruce A. ;
Archibald, Alan L. .
PLOS PATHOGENS, 2017, 13 (02)
[7]   Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose [J].
Busch, Gesa ;
Ryan, Erin ;
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. ;
Weary, Daniel M. .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2022, 39 (01) :151-164
[8]   Examining the relationship between gene editing knowledge, value predispositions, and general science attitudes among U.S. farmers, scientists, policymakers, and the general public [J].
Calabrese, Christopher ;
Featherstone, Jieyu Ding ;
Robbins, Matthew ;
Barnett, George A. .
JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (02) :1-17
[9]  
Callaway E, 2018, NATURE, V560, P16, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-05814-6
[10]   Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems [J].
Clark, Beth ;
Panzone, Luca A. ;
Stewart, Gavin B. ;
Kyriazakis, Ilias ;
Niemi, Jarkko K. ;
Latvala, Terhi ;
Tranter, Richard ;
Jones, Philip ;
Frewer, Lynn J. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01)