Deep Learning for the Classification of Small (≤2 cm) Pulmonary Nodules on CT Imaging: A Preliminary Study

被引:26
作者
Chae, Kum J. [1 ]
Jin, Gong Y. [1 ]
Ko, Seok B. [2 ]
Wang, Yi [2 ]
Zhang, Hao [2 ]
Choi, Eun J. [1 ]
Choi, Hyemi [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Chonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Res Inst Clin Med,Biomed Res Inst, 634-18 Keumam Dong, Jeonju 561712, Jeonbuk, South Korea
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Stat, Jeonju, South Korea
[4] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Inst Appl Stat, Jeonju, South Korea
关键词
Computer-aided diagnosis; Computed tomography; Deep learning; Nodule classification; Pulmonary nodule; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; LUNG-CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2019.05.018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: We aimed to present a deep learning-based malignancy prediction model (CT-lungNET) that is simpler and faster to use in the diagnosis of small (<= 2 cm) pulmonary nodules on nonenhanced chest CT and to preliminarily evaluate its performance and usefulness for human reviewers. Materials and Methods: A total of 173 whole nonenhanced chest CT images containing 208 pulmonary nodules (94 malignant and 11 benign nodules) ranging in size from 5 mm to 20 mm were collected. Pathologically confirmed nodules or nodules that remained unchanged for more than 1 year were included, and 30 benign and 30 malignant nodules were randomly assigned into the test set. We designed CT-lungNET to include three convolutional layers followed by two fully-connected layers and compared its diagnostic performance and processing time with those of AlexNET by using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). An observer performance test was conducted involving eight human reviewers of four different groups (medical students, physicians, radiologic residents, and thoracic radiologists) at test 1 and test 2, referring to the CT-lungNET's malignancy prediction rate with pairwise comparison receiver operating curve analysis. Results: CT-lungNET showed an improved AUROC (0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.93), compared to that of the AlexNET (0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.91). The processing speed per one image slice for CT-lungNET was about 10 times faster than that for AlexNET (0.90 vs. 8.79 seconds). During the observer performance test, the classification performance of nonradiologists was increased with the aid of CTlungN ET, (mean AUC improvement: 0.13; range: 0.03 -0.19) but not significantly so in the radiologists group (mean AUC improvement: 0.02; range: -0.02 to 0.07). Conclusion: CT-lungNET was able to provide better classification results with a significantly shorter amount of processing time as compared to AlexNET in the diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules on nonenhanced chest CT. In this preliminary observer performance test, CT-lungNET may have a role acting as a second reviewer for less experienced reviewers, resulting in enhanced performance in the diagnosis of early lung cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:E55 / E63
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 3D deep learning for detecting pulmonary nodules in CT scans
    Gruetzemacher, Ross
    Gupta, Ashish
    Paradice, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (10) : 1301 - 1310
  • [42] Imaging features and deep learning for prediction of pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma in CT images
    Huang, Junfeng
    Xie, Shuojia
    Huang, Junjie
    Zheng, Ziwen
    Lin, Zikai
    Lin, Jinsheng
    Tang, Kailun
    Meng, Mingqiang
    Zhao, Yulin
    Liao, Wanzhe
    Liu, Chunping
    Gu, Yingying
    Li, Shiyue
    Chen, Huai
    Chen, Ruchong
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (02) : 935 - 952
  • [43] Discrimination between transient and persistent subsolid pulmonary nodules on baseline CT using deep transfer learning
    Huang, Chuxi
    Lv, Wenhui
    Zhou, Changsheng
    Mao, Li
    Xu, Qinmei
    Li, Xinyu
    Qi, Li
    Xia, Fei
    Li, Xiuli
    Zhang, Qirui
    Zhang, Longjiang
    Lu, Guangming
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (12) : 6913 - 6923
  • [44] Classification model of benign and malignant nodules in lung CT images based on deep learning of residual network
    Lin Z.
    Wang G.
    Chen J.
    Fu Q.
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2020, 41 (03): : 248 - 256
  • [45] Deep learning-based growth prediction for sub-solid pulmonary nodules on CT images
    Liao, Ri-qiang
    Li, An-wei
    Yan, Hong-hong
    Lin, Jun-tao
    Liu, Si-yang
    Wang, Jing-wen
    Fang, Jian-sheng
    Liu, Hong-bo
    Hou, Yong-he
    Song, Chao
    Yang, Hui-fang
    Li, Bin
    Jiang, Ben-yuan
    Dong, Song
    Nie, Qiang
    Zhong, Wen-zhao
    Wu, Yi-long
    Yang, Xue-ning
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [46] CT fluoroscopy guided transpleural cutting needle biopsy of small (≤2.5 cm) subpleural pulmonary nodules
    Prosch, Helmut
    Oschatz, Elisabeth
    Eisenhuber, Edith
    Wohlschlager, Helmut
    Mostbeck, Gerhard H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 77 (01) : 164 - 166
  • [47] Classification of lung nodules using deep learning
    Kwajiri T.
    Tezuka T.
    Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering, 2017, 55 (Proc): : 516 - 517
  • [48] Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Coronary Artery Calcium-Scoring CT for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: A Preliminary Study
    Lee, Seung Yun
    Lee, Ji Weon
    Jung, Jung Im
    Han, Kyunghhwa
    Chang, Suyon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 66 (04) : 240 - 248
  • [49] The effectiveness of deep learning model in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules on spiral CT
    Liu, Dongquan
    Zhao, Yonggang
    Liu, Bangquan
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2024, 32 (06) : 5129 - 5140
  • [50] Growth-pattern classification of pulmonary nodules based on variation of CT number histogram and its potential usefulness in nodule differentiation
    Kawata, Y.
    Kawamata, A.
    Niki, N.
    Ohmatsu, H.
    Kakinuma, R.
    Eguchi, K.
    Kaneko, M.
    Moriyama, N.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2009: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 7260