Digital breast tomosynthesis-based peritumoral radiomics approaches in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

被引:19
作者
Niu, Shuxian [1 ]
Yu, Tao [2 ]
Cao, Yan [1 ]
Dong, Yue [2 ]
Luo, Yahong [2 ]
Jiang, Xiran [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Canc Hosp, Liaoning Canc Hosp & Inst, Shenyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
NEURAL-NETWORKS; CANCER; FEATURES; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; MODEL; AGE;
D O I
10.5152/dir.2022.20664
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-based radiomics in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions in women. METHODS A total of 185 patients who underwent DBT scans were enrolled between December 2017 and June 2019. The features of handcrafted and deep learning-based radiomics were extracted from the tumoral and peritumoral regions with different radial dilation distances outside the tumor. A 3-step method was used to select discriminative features and develop the radiomics signature. Discriminative clinical factors were identified by univariate logistic regression. The clinical factors with P < .05 were used to build a clinical model with multivariate logistic regression. The radiomics nomogram was developed by integrating the radiomics signature and discriminative clinical factors. Discriminative performance of the radiomics signature, clinical model, nomogram, and breast imaging reporting and data system assessment were evaluated and compared with the receiver operating characteristic and decision curves analysis (DCA). RESULTS A total of 2 handcrafted and 2 deep features were identified as the most discriminative features from the peritumoral regions with 2 mm dilation distances and used to develop the radiomics signature. The nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature, age, and menstruation status showed the best discriminative performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.980 (95% CI, 0.960 to 1.000; sensitivity = 0.970, specificity = 0.946) in the training cohort and 0.985 (95% CI, 0.960 to 1.000; sensitivity = 0.909, specificity = 0.966) in the validation cohort. DCA confirmed the potential clinical usefulness of our nomogram. CONCLUSION Our results illustrate that the radiomics nomogram integrating the DBT imaging features and clinical factors (age and menstruation status) can be considered as a useful tool in aiding the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach [J].
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. ;
Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios ;
Leijenaar, Ralph T. H. ;
Parmar, Chintan ;
Grossmann, Patrick ;
Cavalho, Sara ;
Bussink, Johan ;
Monshouwer, Rene ;
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin ;
Rietveld, Derek ;
Hoebers, Frank ;
Rietbergen, Michelle M. ;
Leemans, C. Rene ;
Dekker, Andre ;
Quackenbush, John ;
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Lambin, Philippe .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 5
[2]   From Handcrafted to Deep-Learning-Based Cancer Radiomics Challenges and opportunities [J].
Afshar, Parnian ;
Mohammadi, Arash ;
Plataniotis, Konstantinos N. ;
Oikonomou, Anastasia ;
Benali, Habib .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2019, 36 (04) :132-160
[3]   PET/CT radiomics in breast cancer: promising tool for prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Antunovic, Lidija ;
De Sanctis, Rita ;
Cozzi, Luca ;
Kirienko, Margarita ;
Sagona, Andrea ;
Torrisi, Rosalba ;
Tinterri, Corrado ;
Santoro, Armando ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Zelic, Renata ;
Sollini, Martina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (07) :1468-1477
[4]   A performance comparison between shallow and deeper neural networks supervised classification of tomosynthesis breast lesions images [J].
Bevilacqua, Vitoantonio ;
Brunetti, Antonio ;
Guerriero, Andrea ;
Trotta, Gianpaolo Francesco ;
Telegrafo, Michele ;
Moschetta, Marco .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2019, 53 :3-19
[5]   Association of Peritumoral Radiomics With Tumor Biology and Pathologic Response to Preoperative Targeted Therapy for HER2 (ERBB2)-Positive Breast Cancer [J].
Braman, Nathaniel ;
Prasanna, Prateek ;
Whitney, Jon ;
Singh, Salendra ;
Beig, Niha ;
Etesami, Maryam ;
Bates, David D. B. ;
Gallagher, Katherine ;
Bloch, B. Nicolas ;
Vulchi, Manasa ;
Turk, Paulette ;
Bera, Kaustav ;
Abraham, Jame ;
Sikov, William M. ;
Somlo, George ;
Harris, Lyndsay N. ;
Gilmore, Hannah ;
Plecha, Donna ;
Varadan, Vinay ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (04)
[6]   Clinical versus research approach to breast cancer detection with CAD: Where are we now? [J].
Brem, Rachel F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (01) :234-235
[7]   Breast Microcalcification Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Digital Mammograms [J].
Cai, Hongmin ;
Huang, Qinjian ;
Rong, Wentao ;
Song, Yan ;
Li, Jiao ;
Wang, Jinhua ;
Chen, Jiazhou ;
Li, Li .
COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 2019
[8]   Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: Preliminary experience [J].
Chan, HP ;
Wei, J ;
Sahiner, B ;
Rafferty, EA ;
Wu, T ;
Roubidoux, MA ;
Moore, RH ;
Kopans, DB ;
Hadjiiski, LM ;
Helvie, MA .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) :1075-1080
[9]   Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network [J].
Ciritsis, Alexander ;
Rossi, Cristina ;
de Martini, Ilaria Vittoria ;
Eberhard, Matthias ;
Marcon, Magda ;
Becker, Anton S. ;
Berger, Nicole ;
Boss, Andreas .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 92 (1093)
[10]   The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer [J].
Flobbe, K ;
Bosch, AM ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Beets, GL ;
Nelemans, P ;
von Meyenfeldt, MF ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (10) :1194-1199