Electrophysiological correlates of bilateral and unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with bipolar depression

被引:26
|
作者
Kazemi, Reza [1 ]
Rostami, Reza [1 ,2 ]
Khomami, Sanaz [1 ,3 ]
Horacek, Jiri [4 ]
Brunovsky, Martin [4 ]
Novak, Tomas [4 ]
Fitzgerald, Paul B. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Atieh Clin Neurosci Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, Ahvaz, Iran
[4] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Klecany, Czech Republic
[5] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Monash Alfred Psychiat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[6] The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Bipolar disorder; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Electroencephalography; Biomarker; RESOLUTION ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; DOUBLE-BLIND; LOW-FREQUENCY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; UNIPOLAR DEPRESSION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; EEG POWER; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.061
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been demonstrated to have efficacy in the treatment of unipolar depression but limited research has explored the efficacy of rTMS in bipolar depression. Therefore, we conducted a comparative clinical trial evaluating clinical responses to prefrontal bilateral and unilateral rTMS in patients suffering from bipolar depression. We hypothesized that, 1) the response to the treatment would be associated with a decrease in the frequency of beta waves, 2) bilateral stimulation of the cortex would bring about more extensive changes in brain activity than unilateral stimulation, and 3) bilateral stimulation is more effective than unilateral. Thirty patients with bipolar depression were divided into two groups. Bilateral Group (n=15) who received rTMS in the left DLPFC (10 Hz) and right DLPFC (1-Hz), and unilateral group (n=15) who received the stimulation only in the right DLPFC (1-Hz) during 20 treatment sessions. The proportion of responders in the bilateral stimulation group was significantly higher than that in the unilateral group [80% versus 47%]. The remission rate was 40% in the bilateral group and 40% in the unilateral group (not significant). In the responders to bilateral rTMS treatment, a significant reduction of alpha1-2, beta 1-3, and gamma frequencies were observed in medial and superior frontal and cingulate gyrus. Responders to the unilateral treatment showed decrease of gamma frequency in postcentral gyrus, precuneus, superior and inferior parietal lobule, Cuneus and angular gyrus. In conclusion, we found that bilateral stimulation was more effective than the unilateral stimulation and evidence that beta frequency activity could possibly be used as a marker for response to rTMS. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 375
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
    Stern, Adam Philip
    Cohen, Daniel
    NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2013, 3 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [32] Clinical Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder
    Kozel, F. Andrew
    PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 41 (03) : 433 - +
  • [33] Crossover to Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation A Potential Strategy When Patients Are Not Responding to Unilateral Left-Sided High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Cristancho, Pilar
    Trapp, Nicholas T.
    Siddiqi, Shan H.
    Dixon, David
    Miller, J. Philip
    Lenze, Eric J.
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2019, 35 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [34] Unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials over 2 decades
    Sehatzadeh, Shayan
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Yap, Belinda
    Hong-Anh Tu
    Palimaka, Stefan
    Bowen, James M.
    O'Reilly, Daria J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 44 (03): : 151 - 163
  • [35] THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT BIPOLAR DEPRESSION
    Zengin, Gulizar
    Topak, Osman Zulkif
    Atesci, Oyku
    Atesci, Figen Culha
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2022, 34 (02) : 236 - 244
  • [36] Clinical Predictors Associated With Duration of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Remission in Bipolar Depression A Naturalistic Study
    Cohen, Roni B.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Fregni, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2010, 198 (09) : 679 - 681
  • [37] Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    Hoy, Kate E.
    Elliot, David
    McQueen, R. N. Susan
    Wambeek, Lenore E.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 43 (07) : 1565 - 1572
  • [38] Bilateral vs. unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating major depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Jian-jun
    Liu, Zhao
    Zhu, Dan
    Li, Qi
    Zhang, Hongzhi
    Huang, Hua
    Wei, Youdong
    Mu, Jun
    Yang, Deyu
    Xie, Peng
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2014, 219 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [39] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treats postpartum depression
    Garcia, Keith S.
    Flynn, Patricia
    Pierce, Katherine J.
    Caudle, Marty
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2010, 3 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [40] Treatment of patients with geriatric depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    F. Leblhuber
    K. Steiner
    Dietmar Fuchs
    Journal of Neural Transmission, 2019, 126 : 1105 - 1110