Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol

被引:8
作者
van Hees, Suzanne G. M. [1 ,2 ]
Carlier, Bouwine E. [1 ]
Blonk, Roland W. B. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Oomens, Shirley [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] HAN Univ Appl Sci, Occupat & Hlth Res Grp, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Social & Behav Sci, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] North West Univ, Optentia Res Focus Area, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
[4] TNO, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Radboudumc, Dept Primary & Community Care, Sch Occupat Hlth, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 69卷 / 03期
关键词
Realist research; methodology; occupational health; mental disorders; HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; DISABILITY; PEOPLE; RETURN;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-213515
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with commonmental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJECTIVES: 1) to provide insights in applying a realist approach to the literature review process and 2) to present a way to develop an explanatory framework on work participation, the related causal mechanisms and the interaction with the work context. METHODS: A systematic realist literature review, using stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP) as outcomes of work participation. This protocol paper explains the rationale, tools and procedures developed and used for identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: The review process entailed six steps to develop so called 'middle range program theories'. Each step followed a systematic, iterative procedure using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a realist review adds on the understanding to promote work participation, by examining the heterogeneity and complexity of intervention- and observational studies. This paper facilitates other researchers within the field of occupational health by demonstrating ways to develop a framework on work participation using realist synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 838
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders [J].
Andersen, Malene Friis ;
Nielsen, Karina M. ;
Brinkmann, Svend .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2012, 38 (02) :93-104
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Sick on the Job? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work. Mental Health and Work, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264124523-EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Development of Freedom
[5]  
APA, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-V, V5th
[6]  
Booth A., 2018, Doing Realist Research
[7]   To Disclose or Not to Disclose: A Multi-stakeholder Focus Group Study on Mental Health Issues in the Work Environment [J].
Brouwers, E. P. M. ;
Joosen, M. C. W. ;
van Zelst, C. ;
Van Weeghel, J. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 30 (01) :84-92
[8]   The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity [J].
Burton, WN ;
Chen, CY ;
Conti, DJ ;
Schultz, AB ;
Pransky, G ;
Edington, DW .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2005, 47 (08) :769-777
[9]  
Corbiere M, 2013, HDB WORK DISABILITY
[10]   A systematic review of preventive interventions regarding mental health issues in organizations [J].
Corbiere, Marc ;
Shen, Jie ;
Rouleau, Marc ;
Dewa, Carolyn S. .
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2009, 33 (01) :81-116