Lateral sagittal infraclavicular block:: clinical experience in 380 patients

被引:24
作者
Gurkan, Y. [1 ]
Hosten, T. [1 ]
Solak, M. [1 ]
Toker, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kocaeli Univ Hosp, Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
infraclavicular block; nerve stimulation; bupivacaine; levobupivacaine; lidocaine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01504.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility and block success rate of 'lateral sagittal infraclavicular block (LSIB)' in a large-scale clinical study. Methods: Adult patients scheduled for hand, wrist and forearm surgery between March 2005 and June 2007 were prospectively included into the study. Using a nerve stimulator LSIB was performed. In the LSIB technique the puncture site is immediately adjacent to the most medial point of the coracoid process and the anterior surface of the clavicula. The needle is inserted caudally in a sagittal plane, 20 degrees dorsally (downwards), until muscle twitches are observed in synchrony with the stimulation. A Local anesthetic mixture of either 20 ml bupivacaine 5 mg/ml or 20 ml of levobupivacaine 5 mg/ml and 20 ml of lidocaine 20 mg/ml with 5 mu g/ml epinephrine (total volume 40 ml) was administered following electrolocation of the median, radial or ulnar nerve. Results: Three-hundred and eighty patients were included into the study. Block was successful in 341 (89.7%) patients without any need for local anesthetic supplementation. We had complete failure in 17 (4.5%) patients and these patients received general anesthesia. Twenty-two (5.8%) patients needed either infiltration of local anesthetic at the site of skin incision or supplementation of the block at the axilla. No other complications other than vascular punctures - 25 patients (6.6%) - were observed. Conclusions: LSIB provided a clinically acceptable success rate and our results are in agreement with other studies assessing this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 266
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Single-stimulation, low-volume infraclavicular plexus block: Influence of the evoked distal motor response on success rate
    Bloc, Sebastien
    Garnier, Thierry
    Komly, Bernard
    Leclerc, Pascal
    Mercadal, Luc
    Morel, Bertrand
    Dhonneur, Gilles
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (05) : 433 - 437
  • [2] Pneumothorax after coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Crews, James C.
    Gerancher, J. C.
    Weller, Robert S.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (01) : 275 - 277
  • [3] Desroches T, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF03017794
  • [4] Hosten T, 2006, AGRI, V18, P23
  • [5] Klaastad O, 2006, REGION ANESTH PAIN M, V31, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.09.005
  • [6] A novel infraclavicular brachial plexus block:: The lateral and sagittal technique, developed by magnetic resonance imaging studies
    Klaastad, O
    Smith, HJ
    Smedby, Ö
    Winther-Larssen, EH
    Brodal, P
    Breivik, H
    Fosse, ET
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (01) : 252 - 256
  • [7] Infraclavicular block causes less discomfort than axillary block in ambulatory patients
    Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ
    Rasmussen, H
    Hesselbjerg, L
    Nielsen, TP
    Gürkan, Y
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (07) : 1030 - 1034
  • [8] Clinical evaluation of the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block developed by MRI studies
    Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ
    Rasmussen, H
    Hesselbjerg, L
    Gurkan, Y
    Belhage, B
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (04) : 329 - 334
  • [9] A comparison of coracoid and axillary approaches to the brachial plexus
    Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ
    Nielsen, PR
    Mortensen, CR
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (03) : 274 - 279
  • [10] The optimal motor response for infraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Minville, Vincent
    Fourcade, Olivier
    Bourdet, Benoit
    Doherty, Mary
    Chassery, Clement
    Pourrut, Jean-Claude
    Gris, Claude
    Eychennes, Bernard
    Colombani, Aline
    Samii, Kamran
    Bouaziz, Herve
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (02) : 448 - 451