Biology before the SOS Response-DNA Damage Mechanisms at Chromosome Fragile Sites

被引:4
|
作者
Fitzgerald, Devon M. [1 ]
Rosenberg, Susan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Mol & Human Genet, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
chromosome fragile sites; DNA damage; DNA repair; double-strand break repair; Holliday junctions; topoisomerase; DNA structures; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; MISMATCH-REPAIR; INDUCED MUTAGENESIS; MUTANTS DEFICIENT; RECA PROTEIN; REPLICATION; RECOMBINATION; EVOLUTION; METHYLATION; MUTATION;
D O I
10.3390/cells10092275
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Escherichia coli SOS response to DNA damage, discovered and conceptualized by Evelyn Witkin and Miroslav Radman, is the prototypic DNA-damage stress response that upregulates proteins of DNA protection and repair, a radical idea when formulated in the late 1960s and early 1970s. SOS-like responses are now described across the tree of life, and similar mechanisms of DNA-damage tolerance and repair underlie the genome instability that drives human cancer and aging. The DNA damage that precedes damage responses constitutes upstream threats to genome integrity and arises mostly from endogenous biology. Radman's vision and work on SOS, mismatch repair, and their regulation of genome and species evolution, were extrapolated directly from bacteria to humans, at a conceptual level, by Radman, then many others. We follow his lead in exploring bacterial molecular genomic mechanisms to illuminate universal biology, including in human disease, and focus here on some events upstream of SOS: the origins of DNA damage, specifically at chromosome fragile sites, and the engineered proteins that allow us to identify mechanisms. Two fragility mechanisms dominate: one at replication barriers and another associated with the decatenation of sister chromosomes following replication. DNA structures in E. coli, additionally, suggest new interpretations of pathways in cancer evolution, and that Holliday junctions may be universal molecular markers of chromosome fragility.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular mechanisms of nucleolar DNA damage checkpoint response
    Li, Jia
    Yan, Shan
    TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (05) : 361 - 364
  • [32] DNA Damage Response and Immune Defense: Links and Mechanisms
    Nakad, Rania
    Schumacher, Bjoern
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2016, 7
  • [33] The Response to Oxidative DNA Damage in Neurons: Mechanisms and Disease
    Narciso, Laura
    Parlanti, Eleonora
    Racaniello, Mauro
    Simonelli, Valeria
    Cardinale, Alessio
    Merlo, Daniela
    Dogliotti, Eugenia
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2016, 2016
  • [34] Molecular mechanisms involved in initiation of the DNA damage response
    Barnum, Kevin J.
    O'Connell, Matthew J.
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2015, 2 (01):
  • [35] DNA damage response: Mechanisms and role in human cancer
    Bartek, Jiri
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 189 : S21 - S21
  • [36] The activation mechanisms of master kinases in the DNA damage response
    Jianxiong Xiao
    Qinhui Rao
    Yanhui Xu
    Genome Instability & Disease, 2021, 2 (4) : 211 - 224
  • [37] The DNA damage response to radiotherapy: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities
    Morgan, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S340 - S340
  • [38] Mechanisms of APE1 in DNA damage response
    Zhao, Haichao
    Yan, Shan
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 300 (03) : S444 - S444
  • [39] PKCδ signaling:: Mechanisms of DNA damage response and apoptosis
    Yoshida, Kiyotsugu
    CELLULAR SIGNALLING, 2007, 19 (05) : 892 - 901
  • [40] The SOS response:: Recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance
    Sutton, MD
    Smith, BT
    Godoy, VG
    Walker, GC
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 2000, 34 : 479 - 497