Safety and reliability of a handheld stimulator for neural monitoring during thyroid surgery

被引:7
作者
Lawson, Bradley R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kamani, Dipti [1 ]
Shama, Mohamed [1 ]
Kyriazidis, Natalia [1 ]
Randolph, Gregory W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Div Thyroid & Parathyroid Surg, Dept Otolaryngol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Licking Mem Hosp, Newark, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Endotracheal tube surface electrodes; Checkpoint stimulator; neural monitoring; nerve stimulator; electromyography; thyroid surgery; parathyroid surgery; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE; PARATHYROID SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION; PARALYSIS; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1002/lary.28027
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The Checkpoint nerve stimulator (Checkpoint Surgical, Cleveland, OH) is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved device for neural localization and monitoring during surgery. Its safety, efficacy, and reliability for neural monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery have not been compared to more standard formats of neural monitoring. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Vagal, recurrent, and superior laryngeal nerve monitoring were performed using both the Checkpoint stimulator and Medtronic NIM 3.0 laryngeal electromyography endotracheal tube (Medtronic, Jacksonville, FL) during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. A total of 21 operated sides in 15 patients were included for analysis. Latency and amplitude data for the Checkpoint stimulator were recorded using the NIM monitor and compared to normative endotracheal tube surface electrode data. Results Mean amplitude using the Checkpoint stimulator was 574.6 microvolts (mu V), 1060.6 mu V, and 182.8 mu V for the vagus, recurrent laryngeal, and superior laryngeal nerves, respectively. Mean amplitude using standard laryngeal electromyography was 709 mu V, 1077.0 mu V, and 183.7 mu V for the same nerves. Mean latency was significantly shorter with stimulation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve compared to the vagus nerve with both stimulators (P < 0.001). No neural injuries occurred during the study. Conclusion The Checkpoint stimulator is a safe and reliable alternative to traditional laryngeal electromyography providing equivalent induced electromyography of the vocalis for neural monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:561-565, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 565
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility of Attachable Ring Stimulator for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Thyroid Surgery
    Kim, Jongjin
    Moon, Hyeon Jong
    Chai, Young Jun
    Lee, Jung-Man
    Hwang, Ki-Tae
    Wu, Che-Wei
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Kim, Hoon Yub
    Park, Kyung Sik
    Kim, Sang Wan
    Yi, Ka Hee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [22] Opportunities and challenges of intermittent and continuous intraoperative neural monitoring in thyroid surgery
    Schneider, Rick
    Machens, Andreas
    Randolph, Gregory W.
    Kamani, Dipti
    Lorenz, Kerstin
    Dralle, Henning
    GLAND SURGERY, 2017, 6 (05) : 537 - 545
  • [23] Neural monitoring represent central safety asset for new technologies in thyroid surgery in translational protocols
    Sun, Hui
    Wu, Che-Wei
    Kim, Hoon Yub
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 216 (06) : 1235 - 1236
  • [24] Intra-Operative Neural Monitoring of Thyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model
    Wu, Che-Wei
    Huang, Tzu-Yen
    Chen, Hui-Chun
    Chen, Hsiu-Ya
    Tsai, Tsung-Yi
    Chang, Pi-Ying
    Lin, Yi-Chu
    Tseng, Hsin-Yi
    Hun, Pao-Chu
    Liu, Xiaoli
    Sun, Hui
    Randolph, Gregory W.
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Chiang, Feng-Yu
    Lu, I-Cheng
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (144):
  • [25] Safety analysis of vagal nerve stimulation for continuous nerve monitoring during thyroid surgery
    Friedrich, Colin
    Ulmer, Christoph
    Rieber, Fabian
    Kern, Eva
    Kohler, Andrea
    Schymik, Karolina
    Thon, Klaus-Peter
    Lamade, Wolfram
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (09) : 1979 - 1987
  • [26] Trans-thyroid cartilage recording for neural monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery
    Chiang, Feng-Yu
    Wu, Che-Wei
    Chang, Pi-Ying
    Wu, Sheng-Hua
    Chen, Hsiu-Ya
    Lin, Yi-Chu
    Huang, Tzu-Yen
    Zesendavaa, Enkhtuvshin
    Lu, I-Cheng
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (04) : E280 - E283
  • [27] Loss of the nerve monitoring signal during bilateral thyroid surgery
    Dralle, H.
    Sekulla, C.
    Lorenz, K.
    Thanh, P. Nguyen
    Schneider, R.
    Machens, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (08) : 1089 - 1096
  • [28] International neural monitoring study group guideline 2018 part I: Staging bilateral thyroid surgery with monitoring loss of signal
    Schneider, Rick
    Randolph, Gregory W.
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Wu, Che-Wei
    Barczynski, Marcin
    Chiang, Feng-Yu
    Al-Quaryshi, Zaid
    Angelos, Peter
    Brauckhoff, Katrin
    Cernea, Claudio R.
    Chaplin, John
    Cheetham, Jonathan
    Davies, Louise
    Goretzki, Peter E.
    Hartl, Dana
    Kamani, Dipti
    Kandil, Emad
    Kyriazidis, Natalia
    Liddy, Whitney
    Orloff, Lisa
    Scharpf, Joseph
    Serpell, Jonathan
    Shin, Jennifer J.
    Sinclair, Catherine F.
    Singer, Michael C.
    Snyder, Samuel K.
    Tolley, Neil S.
    Van Slycke, Sam
    Volpi, Erivelto
    Witterick, Ian
    Wong, Richard J.
    Woodson, Gayle
    Zafereo, Mark
    Dralle, Henning
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 : S1 - S17
  • [29] Intraoperative neural monitoring in thyroid surgery: lessons learned from animal studies
    Wu, Che-Wei
    Randolph, Gregory W.
    Lu, I-Cheng
    Chang, Pi-Ying
    Chen, Yi-Ting
    Hun, Pao-Chu
    Lin, Yi-Chu
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Chiang, Feng-Yu
    GLAND SURGERY, 2016, 5 (05) : 473 - 480
  • [30] Safety of High-Current Stimulation for Intermittent Intraoperative Neural Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: A Porcine Model
    Lu, I-Cheng
    Chang, Pi-Ying
    Randolph, Gregory W.
    Chen, Hsiu-Ya
    Tseng, Kuang-Yi
    Lin, Yi-Chu
    Chiang, Feng-Yu
    Wu, Che-Wei
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (09) : 2206 - 2212