Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China

被引:466
作者
Zhang, Shengling [1 ]
Wu, Zihao [1 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Hao, Yu [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Resource Management, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[5] Sustainable Dev Res Inst Econ & Soc Beijing, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[6] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Elect Vehicles Beijing, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green credit policy; Environmental regulation; Investment and financing behavior; Environmental effect; Porter hypothesis; RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT; TRADE CREDIT; PANEL; MECHANISM; COMPANIES; CHOICE; IMPACT; MARKET; COSTS; BANKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To direct financial resources to cleaner production enterprises and achieve the goal of environmental governance, the Chinese government has devoted increasing efforts to facilitating green finance. As one of the major policies of green finance, the Green Credit Policy (GCP) was issued in 2012. Evaluating whether the GCP can promote green development has important significance, but few studies have explored its policy effects for the investment and financing behavior of "two high" (high energy consumption and high pollution) enterprises and environmental quality from both micro and macro perspectives. Taking the promulgation of the GCP as a quasinatural experiment, based on a panel dataset involving 945 A-share listed companies and 30 provinces for the period of 2004-2017, this paper adopts the difference-in-difference model to explore the investment and financing behavior changes of enterprises and environmental impacts of the GCP. The following conclusions are derived. (1) The GCP provides incentives for the short-term financing behavior of "two high" enterprises, but it has a punitive effect in the long term and significantly inhibits the investment behavior of such enterprises. (2) The GCP contributes to the mitigation of sulfur dioxide and wastewater emissions. (3) The GCP has a greater effect on investment and financing behavior among state-owned and large-scale "two high" enterprises than among medium-sized and micro enterprises. (4) There exists regional heterogeneity in the effects of the GCP on the investment and financing of "two high" enterprises and environmental quality. The GCP has positive impacts in the eastern and western regions, and the policy effect is not obvious in the central region.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
[11]   The effects of credit policy and financial constraints on tangible and research & development investment: Firm-level evidence from China's renewable energy industry [J].
Chang, Kai ;
Zeng, Yonghong ;
Wang, Weihong ;
Wu, Xin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 130 :438-447
[12]  
Chen D., 2012, J WORLD EC, V3, P89
[13]  
Chen L.-M., 2016, CONT E CONRES, V27, P91, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1005-2674.2016.01.012, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1005-2674.2016.01.012]
[14]  
Chen Q., 2019, CONT FINANCE EC, V3, P118, DOI [10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.2019.03.011, DOI 10.13676/J.CNKI.CN36-1030/F.2019.03.011]
[15]  
Chen W., 1998, J TSINGHUA U SCI TEC, V38, P15, DOI [10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.1998.12.005, DOI 10.16511/J.CNKI.QHDXXB.1998.12.005]
[16]   A model of trade credit in a capital-constrained distribution channel [J].
Chen, Xiangfeng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 159 :347-357
[17]  
Chengliang Y., 2016, FINANCIAL RES, V427, P14
[18]   Law, finance, and firm growth [J].
Demirguc-Kunt, A ;
Maksimovic, V .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1998, 53 (06) :2107-2137
[20]  
Ding J, 2019, ECON REV, P62, DOI DOI 10.19361/J.ER.2019.04.05