Context and capacity: The potential for performance-based agricultural water quality policy

被引:8
作者
Baird, Julia [1 ]
Belcher, Ken W. [2 ]
Quinn, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Bioresource Policy Business & Econ, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Mt Royal Univ, Inst Environm Sustainabil, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; POLLUTION-CONTROL; EXPERIENCE; PROGRAMS; COST; PERSPECTIVES; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/07011784.2014.965033
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Current Canadian policy approaches to agricultural water quality encourage the adoption of best management practices through voluntary, incentive-based measures. Despite these measures, concerns about agricultural impacts on water quality persist. Performance-based policy approaches with incentives that are tied to defined outcomes, and not to particular practices, may have an important role in managing water quality. Five performance-based approaches to address water quality in agricultural landscapes were identified: water quality trading/permitting, differentiated payments for ecosystem services, reverse auctions; emissions charges, and cross-compliance (a hybrid measure). The purpose of this paper is to critically assess the institutional and socio-cultural context that facilitated existing performance-based policy instrument adoption. Through this analysis, three key contextual factors were identified as enablers of performance based approaches: (1) social context, (2) institutional capacity and (3) standardized, consistent and robust estimation methodologies. A framework was developed to classify performance based programs and approaches. The application of the findings from this research and the classification framework provide an organized approach to assess the feasibility of implementing performance-based approaches for agri-environmental water quality policy.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 436
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Abdalla Charles., 2007, CHOICES, V22, P117
[2]  
Allaway C., 2003, PHOSPHOROUS LOADING
[3]  
Amin-Hanjani S., 2006, WATER AGR SUSTAINABI, V14, P337
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[5]  
[Anonymous], REP COMM COUNC EUR P
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Water quality trading programs: An international overview
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 794 USDA EC RES SERV
[8]  
[Anonymous], ENV ENG POLICY
[9]   Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland [J].
Barnes, A. P. ;
Willock, J. ;
Hall, C. ;
Toma, L. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2009, 96 (12) :1715-1722
[10]   Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison [J].
Baylis, Kathy ;
Peplow, Stephen ;
Rausser, Gordon ;
Simon, Leo .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) :753-764