Techniques for measuring medication adherence in hypertensive patients in outpatient settings - Advantages and limitations

被引:75
作者
Hawkshead, Jay
Krousel-Wood, Marie A.
机构
[1] Alton Ochsner Med Fdn & Ochsner Clin, Ctr Hlth Res, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE MEDICATIONS; PHARMACY RECORDS; DRUG-THERAPY; SELF-REPORT; OUTCOMES; MARKER; NONADHERENCE; CONCORDANCE; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.2165/00115677-200715020-00006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Lack of adherence to prescribed antihypertensive regimens constitutes a barrier to adequate blood pressure control and prevention of cardiovascular events. Various means of measuring adherence to antihypertensive medications are currently available for use in clinical practice. The choice of the specific measure used in clinical practice depends on the intended use of the information, the resources available to the provider, as well as patient acceptance and convenience of the method. This article presents an overview of the advantages and limitations of the methods used to measure medication adherence that are currently available for use in outpatient settings, it also outlines provider strategies for addressing adherence issues related to antihypertensive medications. Indirect methods used to measure adherence in the outpatient setting include self report, electronic adherence monitoring (e.g. medication event monitoring system), pharmacy refill rates, and pill counts. Direct methods include the use of bioassays or biomarkers, which involve laboratory detection of the drug or a metabolic product of the drug in a biologic fluid, or laboratory detection of a biologic marker. Direct observation of the patient taking the medication is also another direct method; however, it is impractical in the outpatient setting, especially for long-term treatment. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages; perhaps using a combination of methods may provide the most accurate assessment of adherence. The information gained from measurement of adherence can help to formulate recommendations for individual patients regarding necessary adjustments to their medication-taking behavior to achieve the optimum outcome. Part of the difficulty associated with achieving better medication adherence lies in the inherent complexity of medication-taking decisions and behavior and of relationships between patients, their healthcare providers, and often others involved in the patient's care, such as family members. Poor medication adherence and ultimately, adverse cardiovascular outcomes, is related to a variety of factors: quality of life; complexity of medication regimens; costs of medications; adverse effects of medications; demographic, behavioral, treatment and clinical variables; knowledge of hypertension and healthcare system issues; and use of non-conventional therapies. To be effective, strategies employed in clinical practice to overcome nonadherence need to take into account patients' individual characteristics. Frequently, more than one strategy is necessary to bring about the desired level of adherence. The benefits of proven medical treatments are only available to patients who actively use them; thus, patient adherence to healthcare provider recommendations is the key mediator between medical practice and health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ANASTASIO GD, 1994, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V14, P229
[2]   Assessment of patients' and physicians compliance to an ACE inhibitor treatment based on urinary N-acetyl Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro determination in the noninsulin-dependent diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, cardiovascular events, and Ramipril (DIABHYCAR) study [J].
Azizi, Michel ;
Menard, Joel ;
Peyrard, Severine ;
Lievre, Michel ;
Marre, Michel ;
Chatellier, Gilles .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (06) :1331-1336
[3]   Bromide as a marker to measure adherence to drug therapy [J].
Braam, RL ;
van Uum, SHM ;
Russel, FGM ;
Swinkels, DW ;
Thien, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 62 (04) :285-290
[4]   Relationship of blood pressure control to adherence with anti hypertensive monotherapy in 13 managed care organizations [J].
Bramley, TJ ;
Gerbino, PP ;
Nightengale, BS ;
Frech-Tamas, F .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2006, 12 (03) :239-245
[5]  
BUMIER M, 2003, J HYPERTENS S2, V21, pS37
[6]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[7]   Validation of patient reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy [J].
Choo, PW ;
Rand, CS ;
Inui, TS ;
Lee, MLT ;
Cain, E ;
Cordeiro-Breault, M ;
Canning, C ;
Platt, R .
MEDICAL CARE, 1999, 37 (09) :846-857
[8]   Assessing compliance to antihypertensive medications using computer-based pharmacy records [J].
Christensen, DB ;
Williams, B ;
Goldberg, HI ;
Martin, DP ;
Engelberg, R ;
LoGerfo, JP .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1164-1170
[9]   A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance [J].
Claxton, AJ ;
Cramer, J ;
Pierce, C .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (08) :1296-1310
[10]   Concordance among three self-reported measures of medication adherence and pharmacy refill records [J].
Cook, Christopher L. ;
Wade, William E. ;
Martin, Bradley C. ;
Perri, Matthew, III .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 45 (02) :151-159