Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientation

被引:115
作者
Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie [1 ]
Sheikh, Sana [1 ]
Baldacci, Kate G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
morality; motivation; responsibility; approach; avoidance; politics; liberal; conservative;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent critiques of moral psychology and the contemporary culture wars highlight the need for a better understanding of diverse moral perspectives. A model of moral motives is proposed. The fundamental approach-avoidance distinction in motivation is crossed with self-other focus to create four moral motives: Self-Restraint (avoidance-self), Social Order (avoidance-other), Self-Reliance (approach-self), and Social Justice (approach-other). Three studies explored these motives in the context of political orientation. Overall, political conservatism was associated with avoidance motives and liberalism with approach motives. Approach-a voidance motives were also associated with distinct patterns of results regarding authoritarianism, social dominance, and positions on contemporary social issues. Responses of campus political groups demonstrated the utility of the moral motives in providing a more nuanced view of politics that also takes into account the model's second dimension, for an emphasis on Self focus (personality responsibility) versus Other focus (social responsibility) further distinguished between conservative groups. Moral and political implications are discussed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1099
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Approach and avoidance as action effects
    van Dantzig, Saskia
    Pecher, Diane
    Zwaan, Rolf A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 61 (09) : 1298 - 1306
  • [42] Communicating Moral Motives: The Social Signaling Function of Disgust
    Kupfer, Tom R.
    Giner-Sorolla, Roger
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2017, 8 (06) : 632 - 640
  • [43] On angry approach and fearful avoidance: The goal-dependent nature of emotional approach and avoidance tendencies
    Bossuyt, Evelien
    Moors, Agnes
    De Houwer, Jan
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 50 : 118 - 124
  • [44] Mapping the Moral Domain
    Graham, Jesse
    Nosek, Brian A.
    Haidt, Jonathan
    Iyer, Ravi
    Koleva, Spassena
    Ditto, Peter H.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (02) : 366 - 385
  • [45] Why Do Older Adults Have Sex? Approach and Avoidance Sexual Motives Among Older Women and Men
    Gewirtz-Meydan, Ateret
    Ayalon, Liat
    JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (07) : 870 - 881
  • [46] Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach-approach vs avoidance-avoidance conflicts
    Levy, Ariel
    Enisman, Maya
    Perry, Anat
    Kleiman, Tali
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [47] Relationship between approach and avoidance inclinations to use alcohol and treatment outcomes
    Schlauch, Robert C.
    Stasiewicz, Paul R.
    Bradizza, Clara M.
    Coffey, Scott F.
    Gulliver, Suzy B.
    Gudleski, Gregory D.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2012, 37 (07) : 824 - 830
  • [48] Miller (1944) revisited: Movement times in relation to approach and avoidance conflicts
    Boyd, Ryan L.
    Robinson, Michael D.
    Fetterman, Adam K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (06) : 1192 - 1197
  • [49] EVALUATION OF METAPERCEPTION OF GOAL ORIENTATION AND MORAL FUNCTIONING IN SOCCER SPECTATORS
    Carriedo, A.
    Cecchini, J. A.
    Gonzalez, C.
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE MEDICINA Y CIENCIAS DE LA ACTIVIDAD FISICA Y DEL DEPORTE, 2018, 18 (70): : 341 - 359
  • [50] Approach, avoidance, and inhibition: Personality traits predict cognitive control abilities
    Prabhakaran, Ranjani
    Kraemer, David J. M.
    Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 51 (04) : 439 - 444