Using flowering times and leaf numbers to model the phases of photoperiod -: Sensitivity in Antirrhinum majus L.

被引:20
作者
Adams, SR [1 ]
Munir, M
Valdés, VM
Langton, FA
Jackson, SD
机构
[1] Hort Res Int, Warwick CV35 9EF, England
[2] Univ Reading, Sch Plant Sci, Reading RG6 6AS, Berks, England
关键词
Antirrhiman niajus; snapdragon; photoperiod; reciprocal transfer; flowering; leaf number; model; juvenility;
D O I
10.1093/aob/mcg194
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A model has been developed that can be used to determine the phases of sensitivity to photoperiod for seedlings subjected to reciprocal transfers at regular intervals between long (LD) and short day (SD) conditions. The novel feature of this approach is that it enables the simultaneous analysis of the time to flower and number of leaves below the inflorescence. A range of antirrhinum cultivars were grown, all of which were shown to be quantitative long-day plants. Seedlings were effectively insensitive to photoperiod when very young (juvenile). However, after the end of the juvenile phase, SD delayed flowering and increased the number of leaves below the inflorescence. Plants transferred from LD to SD showed a sudden hastening of flowering and a decrease in leaf number once sufficient LD had been received for flower commitment. Photoperiod had little effect on the rate of flower development. The analysis clearly identified major cultivar differences in the length of the juvenile phase and the photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase in both LD and SID. (C) 2003 Annals of Botany Company.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 696
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   The effects of temperature and light integral on the phases of photoperiod sensitivity in Petunia x hybrida [J].
Adams, SR .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1999, 83 (03) :263-269
[2]   An appraisal of the use of reciprocal transfer experiments:: assessing the stages of photoperiod sensitivity in chrysanthemum cv. Snowdon (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) [J].
Adams, SR ;
Pearson, S ;
Hadley, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1998, 49 (325) :1405-1411
[3]   Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity [J].
Adams, SR ;
Pearson, S ;
Hadley, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2001, 52 (357) :655-662
[4]  
BENJAACOV J, 1969, NEW YORK STATE FLOWE, V285, P1
[5]   Modelling photoperiod and temperature responses of flowering in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) [J].
Bertero, HD ;
King, RW ;
Hall, AJ .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 63 (01) :19-34
[6]  
COCKSHULL KE, 1985, CRC HDB FLOWERING, V1, P476
[7]   Measuring and predicting radiometric properties of reflective shade nets and thermal screens [J].
Cohen, S ;
Fuchs, M .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1999, 73 (03) :245-255
[8]   DURATIONS OF THE PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE AND PHOTOPERIOD-INSENSITIVE PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT TO FLOWERING IN 4 CULTIVARS OF SOYBEAN [GLYCINE-MAX (L) MERRILL] [J].
COLLINSON, ST ;
SUMMERFIELD, RJ ;
ELLIS, RH ;
ROBERTS, EH .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1993, 71 (05) :389-394
[9]   DURATIONS OF THE PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE AND PHOTOPERIOD-INSENSITIVE PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT TO FLOWERING IN 4 CULTIVARS OF RICE (ORYZA-SATIVA L) [J].
COLLINSON, ST ;
ELLIS, RH ;
SUMMERFIELD, RJ ;
ROBERTS, EH .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1992, 70 (04) :339-346
[10]   Environmental control of flowering time in Antirrhinum majus [J].
Cremer, F ;
Havelange, A ;
Saedler, H ;
Huijser, P .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1998, 104 (03) :345-350