Life cycle assessment for a grid-connected multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system of 3 kWp: A case study for Mexico

被引:48
作者
Santoyo-Castelazo, E. [1 ]
Solano-Olivares, K. [2 ]
Martinez, E. [3 ]
Garcia, E. O. [4 ]
Santoyo, E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Escuela Ingn & Ciencias, Calle Puente 222,Ejidos Huipulco,Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Posgrad Ingn, Inst Energias Renovables, Priv Xochicalco,Ctr, Temixco 62580, Morelos, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Posgrad Ingn, Av Univ 3000,CU, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
[4] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Energias Renovables, Priv Xochicalco,Ctr, Temixco 62580, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
Renewable energy; Solar energy; Sustainability; Electricity generation; Climate change; Cradle-to-grave perspective; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENERGY PAYBACK TIME; SCALE PV SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POWER-GENERATION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; SOLAR PV; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128314
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A first life cycle assessment study for the evaluation of a grid-connected photovoltaic system in Mexico was carried out from a cradle-to-grave perspective. The photovoltaic system consists of 12 modules integrated with a multi-crystalline silicon technology with a southward inclination of 20 degrees, a 2.5 kW inverter, and a total installed capacity of 3 kWp, which provides an annual average production of 1282 kWh/kWp with a performance factor of 0.75. This system was installed in a building located in Mexico City. Potential environmental impacts from this photovoltaic system were analysed in eleven categories. The life cycle results show that this technology is within the cleaner energy sources with least environmental impacts throughout its life span. The major environmental impacts were attributed to the production stage, and more specifically, to the manufacturing of materials for the solar modules (which include PV panels, solar cells, and wafers). The multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system evaluated in this study was also compared with three conventional photovoltaic generation systems based on different technologies (i.e., single-crystalline silicon, the amorphous silicon, and the copper-indium-selenium solar cells). From this life cycle assessment, it was found that the multi-crystalline silicon system almost systematically exhibits the lower environmental burdens in most of the impact categories (six out of the eleven), in comparison with other systems which present larger contributions of pollutants during their life span. Regarding to the carbon footprint, it was found that the photovoltaic technology with the lowest global warming potential was related to the multi-crystalline silicon system (47.156 g CO2-eq./kWh), whereas the greatest contribution (69.1 g CO2-eq./kWh) was attributed to the single-crystalline silicon system. By considering these environmental sustainability results, a better technological deployment might be achieved which may help to accelerate, and drive a massive use of solar energy resources towards a clean, sustainable and diversified energy future. Finally, the importance of mapping circular economy opportunities during recycling and waste disposal of materials, and the sustainability trade-offs of solar PV systems have been highlighted as crucial research areas and innovation opportunities for future LCA works.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   Potential energy saving in urban and rural households of Mexico by use of solar water heaters, using geographical information system [J].
Alberto Rosas-Flores, Jorge ;
Rosas-Flores, Dionicio ;
Fernandez Zayas, Jose Luis .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 53 :243-252
[2]   Environmental performance of energy systems of residential buildings: Toward sustainable communities [J].
Anastaselos, Dimitrios ;
Oxizidis, Simeon ;
Manoudis, Alexandros ;
Papadopoulos, Agis M. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 20 :96-108
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J ELECT ELECT ENG
[4]   Resource efficient recovery of critical and precious metals from waste silicon PV panel recycling [J].
Ardente, Fulvio ;
Latunussa, Cynthia E. L. ;
Blengini, Gian Andrea .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 91 :156-167
[5]   Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldinelli, Giorgio ;
D'Alessandro, Francesco ;
Scrucca, Flavio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1113-1122
[6]  
Azapagic A., 2011, Sustainable Development in Practice: Case Studies for Engineers and Scientists, V2nd
[7]   Photovoltaic module recycling, a physical and a chemical recovery process [J].
Azeumo, Maurianne Flore ;
Germana, Conte ;
Ippolito, Nicole Maria ;
Franco, Medici ;
Luigi, Piga ;
Settimio, Santilli .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2019, 193 :314-319
[8]   Life cycle analysis for future photovoltaic systems using hybrid solar cells [J].
Azzopardi, B. ;
Mutale, J. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (03) :1130-1134
[9]  
Baharwani V., 2014, International Journal of Environmental Research and Development, V4, P183
[10]  
Balaji M., 2021, INT J MOD AGR, V10, P858