Exploring System of Systems Resilience Versus Affordability Trade-Space Using a Bio-Inspired Metric

被引:24
作者
Chatterjee, Abheek [1 ]
Malak, Richard [1 ]
Layton, Astrid [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, J Mike Walker 66 Dept Mech Engn, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
关键词
system of systems; SoS architectures; resilience; affordability; bio-inspired design; model-based systems engineering; multidisciplinary optimization; OF-SYSTEMS; DEPENDENCY ANALYSIS; DESIGN; PERSPECTIVE; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1115/1.4050288
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to investigate the value of an ecologically inspired architectural metric called the degree of system order in the system of systems (SoS) architecting process. Two highly desirable SoS attributes are the ability to withstand and recover from disruptions (resilience) and affordability. In practice, more resilient SoS architectures are less affordable, and it is essential to balance the trade-offs between the two attributes. Ecological research analyzing long-surviving ecosystems (nature's resilient SoS) using the degree of system order metric has found a unique balance of efficient and redundant interactions in their architecture. This balance implies that highly efficient ecosystems tend to be inflexible and vulnerable to perturbations, while highly redundant ecosystems fail to utilize resources effectively for survival. Motivated by this unique architectural property of ecosystems, this study investigates the response to disruptions versus affordability trade space of a large number of feasible SoS architectures. Results indicate that the most favorable SoS architectures in this trade space share a specific range of values of degree of system order. This suggests that degree of system order can be a key metric in engineered SoS development. Evaluating the degree of system order does not require detailed simulations and can, therefore, guide the early-stage SoS design process toward more optimal SoS architectures.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, P ASME 2007 INT DESI, DOI DOI 10.1115/DETC2007-34871
[2]   Systems Resilience for Multihazard Environments: Definition, Metrics, and Valuation for Decision Making [J].
Ayyub, Bilal M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (02) :340-355
[3]   Resilience-based network component importance measures [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 117 :89-97
[4]   Interoperability as a Key Concept for the Control and Evolution of the System of Systems (SoS) [J].
Billaud, Stephane ;
Daclin, Nicolas ;
Chapurlat, Vincent .
ENTERPRISE INTEROPERABILITY, IWEI 2015, 2015, 213 :53-63
[5]   Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions [J].
Browning, TR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, 48 (03) :292-306
[6]  
Chatterjee A., 2020, ASME 2019 INT DES EN
[7]  
Chatterjee A., 2020, C SYST ENG RES VIRT
[8]  
Chatterjee A., ASME INT DES ENG TEC
[9]   Mimicking nature for resilient resource and infrastructure network design [J].
Chatterjee, Abheek ;
Layton, Astrid .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 204
[10]   Resilience of the US National Airspace System Airport Network [J].
Clark, Kevin L. ;
Bhatia, Udit ;
Kodra, Evan A. ;
Ganguly, Auroop R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (12) :3785-3794