THE INDIRECT PURCHASER RULE AND PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW: A REASSESSMENT

被引:2
|
作者
Smith, Spencer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sch Law, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
ILLINOIS-BRICK; MONOPOLY OVERCHARGE; RISE; SUE;
D O I
10.1093/joclec/nhaa035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite broad statutory language authorizing "any person" injured by an antitrust law violation to sue for damages, the Supreme Court of the United States has construed that language to bar antitrust damages claims by indirect purchasers, such as consumers two or more steps removed from antitrust violators. The Court and some scholars have justified the indirect purchaser rule on the ground that assigning direct purchasers exclusive rights to recover antitrust damages increases the likelihood of suit. But this article presents new evidence that the rule reduced private antitrust litigation by twenty percent. It argues that the rule should be abandoned, consistent with the statutory text.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 685
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条